Literature DB >> 24593778

Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery.

Liat Salzer1, Ran Nagar, Nir Melamed, Arnon Wiznitzer, Yoav Peled, Yariv Yogev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of successful external cephalic version (ECV) and to compare delivery outcome between women who had a successful ECV and women with spontaneous vertex presentation.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent ECV in a single tertiary medical center between 2007 and 2011. Delivery outcome was compared between women who underwent a trial of vaginal delivery following successful ECV with that of a control group in a 2:1 ratio. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of successful ECV.
RESULTS: Overall 287 were eligible for the study group. Of these 130 (45.3%) had a successful ECV. Polyhydramnios was the strongest factor associated with successful ECV (OR=3.1, 95%-CI 1.4-7.2), followed by transverse lie (versus breech presentation, OR=2.6, 95%-CI 1.2-6.7) and a posterior placenta (OR=1.7, 95%-CI 1.1-3.9), while nulliparity was associated with a lower likelihood of successful ECV (OR=0.4, 95%-CI 0.2-0.6). Women who had a successful ECV and underwent a trial of labor were more likely to deliver by operative vaginal delivery (OVD) (OR=1.8, 95%-CI 1.2-3.6), mainly due to a higher rate of prolonged 2nd, but were not at an increased risk for CS (OR=0.9, 95%-CI 0.4-2.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Counselling to women prior to ECV should address the likelihood of success based on the predicting factors described above, as well as the increased risk for OVD in the case of successful ECV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean; external cephalic; mode of delivery; version

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24593778     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.900749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  6 in total

1.  Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version.

Authors:  A Basu; C Flatley; S Kumar
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ambrogio P Londero; Anjeza Xholli; Claudia Massarotti; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Angelo Cagnacci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Sonographic assessment of placental location: a mere notional description or an important key to improve both pregnancy and perinatal obstetrical care? A large cohort study.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Marco Noventa; Amerigo Vitagliano; Michela Quaranta; Valentina Di Giovanni; Shara Borgato; Carlo Saccardi; Donato D'Antona
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

4.  External Cephalic Version: A Dying Art Worth Reviving.

Authors:  Raj Lakshmi Nalam; Priya Chinnachamy; Paul Emmanuel
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-02-08

5.  Revisiting the management of term breech presentation: a proposal for overcoming some of the controversies.

Authors:  Lionel Carbillon; Amelie Benbara; Ahmed Tigaizin; Rouba Murtada; Marion Fermaut; Fatma Belmaghni; Alexandre Bricou; Jeremy Boujenah
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Caesarean section trends in Catalonia between 2013 and 2017 based on the Robson classification system: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Garazi Carrillo-Aguirre; Albert Dalmau-Bueno; Carlos Campillo-Artero; Anna García-Altés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.