Carlos De las Cuevas1,2, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez2,3, Amado Rivero-Santana2,4, Ausiàs Cebolla-Martí5, Isabelle Scholl6, Martin Härter6. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain. 2. Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain. 3. Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), Tenerife, Spain. 4. Canarian Foundation of Health and Research (FUNCIS), Tenerife, Spain. 5. Universitat Jaume I, CIBEROBN Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y la Nutrición, Castellon de la Plana, Spain. 6. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected in primary care health centres. Patients suffering from chronic diseases and facing a medical decision were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Spanish using the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures as the methodological model for Spanish translation. Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity [exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] were assessed. RESULTS: The final Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested in a primary care sample of 540 patients. The SDM-Q-9 presented adequate reliability and acceptable validity. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.885 for the whole scale. EFA showed a two-factorial solution, and for the CFA, the best solution was obtained with a one-dimensional factor with the item 1 excluded, which produced the best indexes of fit. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 showed adequate reliability and acceptable validity parameters among primary care patients. The SDM-Q-9 is suitable for use in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries with similarly organized health-care systems. The use of the SDM-Q-9 may contribute to the evaluation of SDM process from the patient's perspective.
OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected in primary care health centres. Patients suffering from chronic diseases and facing a medical decision were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Spanish using the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures as the methodological model for Spanish translation. Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity [exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] were assessed. RESULTS: The final Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested in a primary care sample of 540 patients. The SDM-Q-9 presented adequate reliability and acceptable validity. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.885 for the whole scale. EFA showed a two-factorial solution, and for the CFA, the best solution was obtained with a one-dimensional factor with the item 1 excluded, which produced the best indexes of fit. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 showed adequate reliability and acceptable validity parameters among primary care patients. The SDM-Q-9 is suitable for use in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries with similarly organized health-care systems. The use of the SDM-Q-9 may contribute to the evaluation of SDM process from the patient's perspective.
Authors: D Simon; G Schorr; M Wirtz; A Vodermaier; C Caspari; B Neuner; C Spies; T Krones; H Keller; A Edwards; A Loh; M Härter Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2006-07-26
Authors: Paula Jimenez-Fonseca; Urbano Lorenzo-Seva; Pere Joan Ferrando; Alberto Carmona-Bayonas; Carmen Beato; Teresa García; María Del Mar Muñoz; Avinash Ramchandani; Ismael Ghanem; Alejandra Rodríguez-Capote; Carlos Jara; Caterina Calderon Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nathan Alhalel; Nicolas O Francone; Alice M Salazar; Sharon Primeaux; Richard Ruiz; Juan Carlos Caicedo; Elisa J Gordon Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Inés Morán-Sánchez; María A Bernal-López; Maria D Pérez-Cárceles Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: P Jimenez-Fonseca; C Calderon; A Carmona-Bayonas; M M Muñoz; R Hernández; M Mut Lloret; I Ghanem; C Beato; D Cacho Lavín; A Ivars Rubio; R Carrión; C Jara Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Kiara Alvarez; Ye Wang; Margarita Alegria; Andrea Ault-Brutus; Natasha Ramanayake; Yi-Hui Yeh; Julia R Jeffries; Patrick E Shrout Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2016-09
Authors: Carlos De Las Cuevas; Wenceslao Peñate; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 2.570
Authors: Sumayah Rodenburg-Vandenbussche; Arwen H Pieterse; Pieter M Kroonenberg; Isabelle Scholl; Trudy van der Weijden; Gre P M Luyten; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Henk den Ouden; Ingrid V E Carlier; Irene M van Vliet; Frans G Zitman; Anne M Stiggelbout Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240