| Literature DB >> 24592381 |
Guillermo Espinosa-Reyes1, Donaji J González-Mille1, César A Ilizaliturri-Hernández1, Jesús Mejía-Saavedra1, V Gabriela Cilia-López1, Rogelio Costilla-Salazar2, Fernando Díaz-Barriga1.
Abstract
Mining is one of the most important industrial activities worldwide. During its different stages numerous impacts are generated to the environment. The activities in the region have generated a great amount of mining residues, which have caused severe pollution and health effects in both human population and biotic components. The aim of this paper was to assess the impact of mining activities on biotic communities within the district of Villa de la Paz. The results showed that the concentrations of As and Pb in soil were higher than the national regulations for urban or agricultural areas. The bioavailability of these metals was certified by the presence of them in the roots of species of plants and in kidneys and livers of wild rodents. In regard to the community analysis, the sites that were located close to the mining district of Villa de la Paz registered a lower biological diversity, in both plants and wild rodents, aside from showing a change in the species composition of plant communities. The results of this study are evidence of the impact of mining on biotic communities, and the need to take into account the wildlife in the assessment of contaminated sites.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24592381 PMCID: PMC3925625 DOI: 10.1155/2014/165046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Location of the sampling sites in the mining region of Villa de la Paz, San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Contaminated sites (gray circles); reference sites (black circles). RDS: rosettophyllous desert scrub; MDS: microphyllous desert scrub.
Concentrations (mg/kg) of As, Cu, Pb, and Zn in soil by vegetation type.
| Vegetation types | Site | As | Cu | Pb | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS | Reference | 46.8 | 16.3 | 16.8 | 57.7 |
| (12.0–23.0) | (10.0–20.0) | (23.8–97.6) | (45.0–125.0) | ||
| Contaminated | 222.1* | 231.9* | 204.3* | 175.4* | |
| (125.8–329.3) | (155.0–382.5) | (117.9–487.1) | (125.0–275.0) | ||
| MDS | Reference | 23 | 25.6 | 23.5 | 87.3 |
| (18.3–38.5) | (22.5–30.0) | (15.9–31.2) | (57.5–280.0) | ||
| Contaminated | 7902.6* | 703.7* | 1228.2* | 3513.5* | |
| (502.0–17325.0) | (292.5–1080.0) | (428.1–2226.8) | (505.0–6325.0) | ||
| NOM-147-SEMARNAT/SSA1-2004 agricultural/residential land | 22 | — | 400 | — | |
| CEQG agricultural land | 12 | 63 | 70 | 200 | |
The values represent the mean and range. RDS: rosettophyllous desert scrub; MDS: microphyllous desert scrub. *Statistically different concentrations (P < 0.05) in relation to the reference site; —: not mentioned.
Concentrations (mg/kg) of As, Cu, Pb, and Zn, in roots, by species and vegetation type.
| Vegetation types | Site | Specie | As | Cu | Pb | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDS | Reference |
| 1.6 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 9.3 |
| (1.4–1.9) | (1.5–2.8) | (0.2–0.4) | (5.0–14.1) | |||
|
| 0.5 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 8.9 | ||
| (0.1–1.0) | (2.3–3.5) | (0.4–0.6) | (5.8–13.0) | |||
|
| 0.7 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 11.2 | ||
| (0.2–1.1) | (2.5–4.8) | (0.2–1.0) | (7.5–14.8) | |||
|
| 0.7 | 10.0 | 22.3 | 1.0 | ||
| Contaminated |
| 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 5.6 | |
| (0.7–2.3) | (0.2–2.8) | (0.3–0.5) | (4.5–7.0) | |||
|
| 1.1* | 4.5* | 1.7* | 8.4 | ||
| (0.8–1.6) | (3.3–6.1) | (0.7–3.6) | (6.4–13.0) | |||
|
| 2.6* | 7.3* | 0.9 | 37.8* | ||
| (1.1–4.7) | (3.0–10.5) | (0.3–2.0) | (13.5–52.0) | |||
|
| 1.1 | 11.3 | 16.0 | 2.1 | ||
|
| ||||||
| MDS | Reference |
| 0.3 | 6.0 | 0.3 | 12.5 |
| (0.1–0.7) | (3.9–7.4) | (0.2–0.5) | (8.9–20.5) | |||
|
| 0.3 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 14.0 | ||
| (0.2–0.5) | (2.5–3.6) | (0.4–0.7) | (10.8–17.5) | |||
|
| 1.1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 6.0 | ||
| (1.0–1.4) | (1.5–2.0) | (0.02–0.3) | (4.5–7.8) | |||
|
| 1.6 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 6.7 | ||
| (0.8–2.3) | (1.5–7.5) | (2.8–5.6) | (5.3–8.5) | |||
| Contaminated |
| 4.3* | 10.6* | 1.3* | 38.5* | |
| (1.4–14.1) | (8.0–18.1) | (0.4–4.1) | (12.8–129.3) | |||
|
| 5.1* | 14.0* | 2.2* | 23.1* | ||
| (3.2–6.2) | (9.5–19.8) | (1.4–2.5) | (17.8–30.0) | |||
|
| 22.0* | 13.4* | 2.3* | 5.4 | ||
| (1.9–43.9) | (8.5–20.5) | (1.4–3.2) | (5.0–6.3) | |||
|
| 15.2* | 12.0* | 365.5* | 1.7* | ||
| (1.3–32.1) | (8.3–20.5) | (0.8–2.6) | (307.5–422.5) | |||
The values represent the mean and range. RDS: rosettophyllous desert scrub; MDS: microphyllous desert scrub. The range is not shown for the D. acerosa, because there was only one analyzed compound sample. *P < 0.05 with regard to the reference site for the same species and vegetation type. Kamo: K. mollis, Agle: A. lechuguilla, Jadi: J. dioica, Dyac: D. acerosa, Latr: L. tridentata, Pain: P. incanum, and Ziac: Z. acerosa.
Richness, total diversity, and by stratus for the RDS and the MDS.
| Vegetation types | Contaminated | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness | Diversity | Richness | Diversity | ||
| RDS | Herbaceous | 10 | 0.75 | 10 | 0.61 |
| Bushy | 10 | 0.71* | 9 | 0.51 | |
| Total |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| MDS | Herbaceous | 8 | 0.6* | 17 | 1.04 |
| Bushy | 5 | 0.55* | 15 | 0.98 | |
| Subarboreal | 2 | 0.05* | 1 | 0 | |
| Total |
|
|
|
| |
*P < 0.05.
Figure 2Abundance-diversity model from the rosettophyllous desert scrub (RDS). 1: species with the greatest abundance in the reference site, 2: species with a greater abundance in the impacted site, 3: species only present in the reference site, and 4: species only present in the impacted site (see Table 4 for the acronyms).
Figure 3Abundance-diversity model from the microphyllous desert scrub (MDS). 1: species with the greatest abundance in the reference site, 2: species with a greater abundance in the impacted site, 3: species only present in the reference site, and 4: species only present in the impacted site (see Table 4 for the acronyms).
Composition of species for the rosettophyllous desert scrub (RDS) and the microphyllous desert scrub (MDS).
| Site | Species | Acronym | RDS | MDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contaminated | Reference | Contaminated | Reference | |||
| Both sites |
| Dyac | X | X | X | X |
|
| Prla | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Pain | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Latr | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Jadi | X | X | X | X | |
|
| Zatr | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Sewi | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Baab | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Ziac | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Eupo | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Trsp | — | — | X | X | |
|
| Buda | X | X | — | — | |
|
| Agle | X | X | — | — | |
|
| Kamo | X | X | — | — | |
|
| Opst | X | X | — | — | |
|
| Acsp | X | X | — | — | |
|
| Mibi | X | X | — | — | |
|
| Liru | X | X | — | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Only impacted |
| Loco | X | — | — | — |
|
| Mehe | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Cofa | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Erka | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Eupo | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Hasp | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Cosp | X | — | X | — | |
|
| Brbe | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Lybe | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Scsp | X | — | — | — | |
|
| Tica | X | — | X | — | |
|
| Tran | — | — | X | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Only reference |
| Bocu | — | X | — | — |
|
| Ceci | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Kabl | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Cosh | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Lybe | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Opli | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Phsp | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Mehe | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Cepa | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Dabi | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Erka | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Ople | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Agsa | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Mibi | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Busc | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Lisp | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Acsp | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Ceal | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Lasp | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Saba | — | X | — | X | |
|
| Stsp | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Visp | — | — | — | X | |
|
| Bapr | — | X | — | — | |
|
| Eval | — | X | — | — | |
|
| Siab | — | X | — | — | |
|
| Amde | — | X | — | — | |
|
| Come | — | X | — | — | |
|
| Dise | — | X | — | — | |
|
| Fepi | — | X | — | — | |
|
| Scpo | — | X | — | — | |
Captured species from the mining site in Villa de la Paz, San Luis Potosí.
| Site | Family | Species | Acronym | Relative Abundance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | Muridae |
| Sihi | 2.33 |
|
| Neme | 2.33 | ||
|
| Pema | 9.30 | ||
|
| Peer | 11.63 | ||
| Heteromyidae |
| Chne | 18.60 | |
|
| Dime | 55.81 | ||
|
| ||||
| Contaminated | Heteromyidae |
| Chne | 47.06 |
|
| Dime | 52.94 | ||
Figure 4Diversity of rodents in the mining site of Villa de la Paz and the reference zone.