Literature DB >> 1992495

Small mammals as monitors of environmental contaminants.

S S Talmage1, B T Walton.   

Abstract

The merit of using small mammals as monitors of environmental contaminants was assessed using data from the published literature. Information was located on 35 species of small mammals from 7 families used to monitor heavy metals, radionuclides, and organic chemicals at mine sites, industrial areas, hazardous and radioactive waste disposal sites, and agricultural and forested land. To document foodchain transfer of chemicals, concentrations in soil, vegetation, and invertebrates, where available, were included. The most commonly trapped North American species were Peromyscus leucopus, Blarina brevicauda, and Microtus pennsylvanicus. In these species, exposure to chemicals was determined from tissue residue analyses, biochemical assays, and cytogenetic assays. Where enough information was available, suitable target tissues, or biological assays for specific chemicals were noted. In general, there was a relationship between concentrations of contaminants in the soil or food, and concentrations in target tissues of several species. This relationship was most obvious for the nonessential heavy metals, cadmium, lead, and mercury and for fluoride. Kidney was the single best tissue for residue analyses of inorganic contaminants. However, bone should be the tissue of choice for both lead and fluorine. Exposure to lead was also successfully documented using biochemical and histopathological endpoints. Bone was the tissue of choice for exposure to 90Sr, whereas muscle was an appropriate tissue for 137Cs. For organic contaminants, exposure endpoints depended on the chemical(s) of concern. Liver and whole-body residue analyses, as well as enzyme changes, organ histology, genotoxicity, and, in one case, population dynamics, were successfully used to document exposure to these contaminants. Based on information in these studies, each species' suitability as a monitor for a specific contaminant or type of contaminant was evaluated and subsequently ranked. A relationship between contaminant exposure and trophic level emerged. Insectivores (shrews) had the highest levels of contaminants, followed by omnivores (cricetid mice) with intermediate levels, and herbivores (voles) with the lowest levels. A substantial number of these biomonitoring studies using small mammals collectively point to the importance of food habits and habitat of small mammals, and their availability and abundance as factors that should influence species selection for monitoring studies. The type of contaminants under consideration as well as the appropriateness of the endpoints selected are important factors to consider when deciding whether or not to include small mammals in biomonitoring studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1992495     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3078-6_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of two wild rodent species as sentinels of environmental contamination by mine tailings.

Authors:  E Tovar-Sánchez; L T Cervantes; C Martínez; E Rojas; M Valverde; M L Ortiz-Hernández; P Mussali-Galante
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mercury in soil, earthworms and organs of voles Myodes glareolus and shrew Sorex araneus in the vicinity of an industrial complex in Northwest Russia (Cherepovets).

Authors:  V T Komov; E S Ivanova; N Y Poddubnaya; V A Gremyachikh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Food chain transfer and potential renal toxicity of mercury to small mammals at a contaminated terrestrial field site.

Authors:  S S Talmage; B T Walton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Uptake of environmental contaminants by small mammals in pickleweed habitats at San Francisco Bay, California.

Authors:  D R Clark; K S Foerster; C M Marn; R L Hothem
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Lead line in rodents: an old sign of lead intoxication turned into a new method for environmental surveillance.

Authors:  Fellipe Augusto Tocchini de Figueiredo; Junia Ramos; Erika R Hashimoto Kawakita; Alina S Bilal; Frederico B de Sousa; William D Swaim; Joao P Mardegan Issa; Raquel F Gerlach
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Accumulation and biological effects of metals in wild rats in mining areas of Zambia.

Authors:  Shouta M M Nakayama; Yoshinori Ikenaka; Kyohei Hamada; Kaampwe Muzandu; Kennedy Choongo; John Yabe; Takashi Umemura; Mayumi Ishizuka
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  A study on the concentration of heavy metals and histopathological changes in Persian jirds (Mammals; Rodentia), affected by mining activities in an iron ore mine in Iran.

Authors:  Amir Shahsavari; Fatemeh Tabatabaei Yazdi; Zahra Moosavi; Ava Heidari; Pourya Sardari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Hepatic mercury, cadmium, and lead in mink and otter from New York State: monitoring environmental contamination.

Authors:  David T Mayack
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 9.  A niche for infectious disease in environmental health: rethinking the toxicological paradigm.

Authors:  Beth J Feingold; Leora Vegosen; Meghan Davis; Jessica Leibler; Amy Peterson; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Noninvasive heavy metal pollution assessment by means of Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus) hair from Galicia (NW Spain): a comparison with invasive samples.

Authors:  David Hernández-Moreno; Irene de la Casa Resino; Luis E Fidalgo; Luis Llaneza; Francisco Soler Rodríguez; Marcos Pérez-López; Ana López-Beceiro
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.