Literature DB >> 24592093

The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination cycles: a retrospective study.

Elvan Koyun Ok1, Omer Erbil Doğan1, Recep Emre Okyay1, Bülent Gülekli1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of post-wash total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective study included a total of 156 cycles (141 couples) and was performed in our center over a 24-month period. The semen parameters were recorded for each man and each insemination. The semen samples were re-evaluated after the preparation process. Post-wash TPMSC values were divided into four groups; Group 1: <1×10(6); Group 2: 1-4.9×10(6); Group 3: 5-9.9×10(6); Group 4: 10×10(6) and >10×10(6). Post-wash inseminated semen volume was divided into three groups; Group 1: 0.3 mL; Group 2: 0.4 mL; Group 3: 0.5 mL. The effect of post-wash total progressive motile sperm and semen volume on pregnancy outcomes was evaluated.
RESULTS: The pregnancy rates per cycle and per couple were 27.56% and 30.49%, respectively. There was not a significant relationship between the inseminated semen volume and pregnancy rate (p>0.05). However, a significant linear-by-linear association was documented between the TPMSC and pregnancy rate (p=0.042).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the post-wash inseminated semen volume should be between 0.3-0.5 mL. An average post-wash total motile sperm count of 10×10(6) may be a useful threshold value for IUI success, but more studies are needed to determine a cut-off value for TPMSC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrauterine insemination; post-wash semen volume; post-wash total progressive motile sperm count; pregnancy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24592093      PMCID: PMC3928411          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.52280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  7 in total

1.  Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  David C Miller; Brent K Hollenbeck; Gary D Smith; John F Randolph; Gregory M Christman; Yolanda R Smith; Dan I Lebovic; Dana A Ohl
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Radiologic evaluation of incremental intrauterine instillation of contrast material.

Authors:  J G Franco Júnior; R L Baruffi; A L Mauri; S C Stone
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Sperm washing and intrauterine insemination for cervical factor, oligospermia, immunologic infertility and unexplained infertility.

Authors:  P C Galle; M A McRae; J A Colliver; J S Alexander
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Effect of inseminated volume on intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  V F Do Amaral; R A Ferriani; R M Dos Reis; M M De Sala; M D De Moura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  R Fanchin; F Olivennes; C Righini; A Hazout; B Schwab; R Frydman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Performance of the postwash total motile sperm count as a predictor of pregnancy at the time of intrauterine insemination: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Janne-Meije van Weert; Sjoerd Repping; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Fulco van der Veen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The influence of sperm morphology, total motile sperm count of semen and the number of motile sperm inseminated in sperm samples on the success of intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Roshan Nikbakht; Nasrin Saharkhiz
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-22
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Predictive value of postwashed total progressively motile sperm count using CASA estimates in 6871 non-donor intrauterine insemination cycles.

Authors:  Orkun Tan; Thoa Ha; Bruce R Carr; Paul Nakonezny; Kathleen M Doody; Kevin J Doody
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Intrauterine insemination cycles: prediction of success and thresholds for poor prognosis and futile care.

Authors:  Alessandra J Ainsworth; Emily P Barnard; Sarah C Baumgarten; Amy L Weaver; Zaraq Khan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Effect of sperm count on success of intrauterine insemination in couples diagnosed with male factor infertility.

Authors:  Erhong Zhang; Xin Tao; Weijie Xing; Liuhong Cai; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2014-10-29

4.  Clinical success of IUI cycles with donor sperm is not affected by total inseminated volume: a RCT.

Authors:  Jorge Rodriguez-Purata; Laura Latre; Marta Ballester; Clara González-Llagostera; Ignacio Rodríguez; Iñaki Gonzalez-Foruria; Rosario Buxaderas; Francisca Martinez; Pedro N Barri; Buenaventura Coroleu
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-02-15

5.  A comprehensive evaluation of pre- and post-processing sperm parameters for predicting successful pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination with the husband's sperms.

Authors:  Yumei Luo; Mingxing Liu; Shunhong Wu; Mimi Zhang; Jingru Yuan; Yufang Zhong; Qing Li; Xiaofang Sun; Xia Xu; Detu Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.