Literature DB >> 24591951

Comparison of ovulation induction and pregnacy outcomes in IVF patients with normal ovarian reserve who underwent long protocol with recombinant-FSH and highly purified-hMG.

Cem Celik1, Kenan Sofuoğlu2, Selçuk Selçuk2, Mehmet Reşit Asoğlu2, Remzi Abalı1, Elçin Cetingöz2, Bahar Baykal2, Mehmet Uludoğan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gonadotropins used in controlled ovarian stimulation have been increasing in number. Beside the recombinant preparations such as rec-FSH, rec-LH and h-hMG human-derived preparations have entered the market. We decided to compare the effects of rec-FSH and HP-hMG with GnRHa on embryo quality and pregnancy outcome in women undergoing an IVF cycle.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, data of 87 patients who had applied to our center from 2007 to 2008 and who had met all inclusion criteria, were analyzed. The patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with HP-hMG, rec-FSH following down-regulation with a GnRHa in a long protocol, selected according to determined criteria and acquired embryo via IVF transfer.
RESULTS: Of the 87 patients, 44 were stimulated with rec-FSH and 43 with HP-hMG. Distribution of infertility causes was similar between the groups. Duration of gonadotropin administration (p=0.677, Student's t-test) and the total dose of gonadotropin received (p=0.392, Student's t-test) were similar between the two groups. The fertilization rate of the rec-FSH group was significantly higher than the HP-hMG group (p=0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). No significant differences were observed between the study groups in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy parameters.
CONCLUSION: The higher oocyte yield with rec-FSH does not result in higher quality embryos. LH activity in combination with FSH activity positively affected the oocyte and embryo maturation. Therefore, when we consider the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates there is no inferiority of HP-hMG in controlled ovarian stimulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HP-hMG; Ovarian stimulation; rec-FSH

Year:  2011        PMID: 24591951      PMCID: PMC3939284          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  17 in total

1.  Human menopausal gonadotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles.

Authors:  Madelon van Wely; Lars G Westergaard; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Fulco van der Veen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Reevaluation of the roles of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in the ovulatory process.

Authors:  S C Chappel; C Howles
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists--a randomized study.

Authors:  E Bosch; C Vidal; E Labarta; C Simon; J Remohi; A Pellicer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Efficacy of low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin alone to complete controlled ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Filicori; Graciela Estela Cognigni; Elena Gamberini; Lodovico Parmegiani; Enzo Troilo; Brunilde Roset
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in normogonadotropic women down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist who were undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  L G Westergaard; K Erb; S B Laursen; S Rex; P E Rasmussen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Human cumulus granulosa cell gene expression: a predictor of fertilization and embryo selection in women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  L J McKenzie; S A Pangas; S A Carson; E Kovanci; P Cisneros; J E Buster; P Amato; M M Matzuk
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Effects of profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation on follicular activity, oocyte and embryo function in cycles stimulated with purified follicle stimulating hormone.

Authors:  R Fleming; F Lloyd; M Herbert; J Fenwick; T Griffiths; A Murdoch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Søren Ziebe; Kersti Lundin; Ronny Janssens; Lisbeth Helmgaard; Joan-Carles Arce
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Effectiveness of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin vs. recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in first-cycle in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients.

Authors:  Peter G A Hompes; Frank J Broekmans; Diederik A Hoozemans; Roel Schats
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Modulation of folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis in women by graded menotrophin administration.

Authors:  M Filicori; G E Cognigni; P Pocognoli; C Tabarelli; D Spettoli; S Taraborrelli; W Ciampaglia
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.