Literature DB >> 24590144

A meta-analysis of reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture.

Helena Johansson1, Anders Odén, John A Kanis, Eugene V McCloskey, Howard A Morris, Cyrus Cooper, Samuel Vasikaran.   

Abstract

The aim of this report was to summarize the clinical performance of two reference bone turnover markers (BTMs) in the prediction of fracture risk. We used an updated systematic review to examine the performance characteristics of serum procollagen type I N propeptide (s-PINP) and serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTX) in fracture risk prediction in untreated individuals in prospective cohort studies. We excluded cross-sectional studies. Ten potentially eligible publications were identified and six included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant association between s-PINP and the risk of fracture. The hazard ratio per SD increase in s-PINP (gradient of risk [GR]) was 1.23 (95 % CI 1.09-1.39) for men and women combined unadjusted for bone mineral density. There was also a significant association between s-CTX and risk of fracture, GR = 1.18 (95 % CI 1.05-1.34) unadjusted for bone mineral density. For the outcome of hip fracture, the association between s-CTX and risk of fracture was slightly higher, 1.23 (95 % CI 1.04-1.47). Thus, there is a modest but significant association between BTMs and risk of future fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24590144     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-014-9842-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  57 in total

1.  Differential effects of calcium- and vitamin D-fortified milk with FOS-inulin compared to regular milk, on bone biomarkers in Chinese pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Marlena C Kruger; Yoke Mun Chan; Barbara Kuhn-Sherlock; Lee Ting Lau; ChinChin Lau; Y S Chin; Joanne M Todd; Linda M Schollum
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical management of primary and secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Samuel D Vasikaran; S A Paul Chubb
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  [Biochemical markers of bone metabolism and their importance].

Authors:  B Obermayer-Pietsch; V Schwetz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Cancel the denosumab holiday.

Authors:  M R McClung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteoporosis Management in Ankylosing Spondylitis.

Authors:  Alicia M Hinze; Grant H Louie
Journal:  Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 6.  The Utility of Biomarkers in Osteoporosis Management.

Authors:  Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Impact of Dietary Intake on Bone Turnover in Patients with Phenylalanine Hydroxylase Deficiency.

Authors:  Kathryn E Coakley; Eric I Felner; Vin Tangpricha; Peter W F Wilson; Rani H Singh
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2017-01-28

8.  Soluble CD14 and fracture risk.

Authors:  M Bethel; P Bůžková; H A Fink; J A Robbins; J A Cauley; J Lee; J I Barzilay; D I Jalal; L D Carbone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Association of bone turnover markers with volumetric bone loss, periosteal apposition, and fracture risk in older men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik longitudinal study.

Authors:  E A Marques; V Gudnason; T Lang; G Sigurdsson; S Sigurdsson; T Aspelund; K Siggeirsdottir; L Launer; G Eiriksdottir; T B Harris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Effects of short-term step aerobics exercise on bone metabolism and functional fitness in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  H J Wen; T H Huang; T L Li; P N Chong; B S Ang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.