Literature DB >> 24588437

Continuous intra-arterial blood glucose monitoring using quenched fluorescence sensing: a product development study.

Oliver J Flower1, Simon Bird2, Lewis Macken2, Naomi Hammond2, Elizabeth Yarad2, Frances Bass2, Charles Fisher2, Paul Strasma3, Simon Finfer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has the potential to improve the management of blood glucose (BG) and so improve patient safety and outcomes in intensive care units. The GluCath Intravascular CGM (IV-CGM) System (GluMetrics) uses a novel quenched chemical fluorescence sensing mechanism to measure BG.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the safety and performance of the GluCath IV-CGM for a 24-hour period in 20 patients admitted to an ICU after cardiac surgery.
METHODS: Heparin-bonded sensors were deployed via a standard 20-gauge radial arterial catheter inserted for routine care in 21 participants after cardiac surgery. Sensors were inserted shortly after ICU admission and BG was monitored for up to 24 hours. After an in vivo calibration, the system recorded BG every minute. Ultrasound examinations checked for sensor position and the presence of thrombus. Outcome measures were qualitative (ease of use, interference with clinical care, blood pressure monitoring and blood sampling) and quantitative (accuracy in comparison with hourly measurements from a reference analyser). BG was managed according to usual protocols.
RESULTS: Of 21 sensors deployed, one failed and one was malpositioned due to operator error. A total of 488 reference samples were collected, with BG concentrations ranging from 4.7mmol/L to 13.4 mmol/L. Calibration samples, samples from the malpositioned sensor and six samples affected by technical errors were excluded. Of 437 paired sensor and reference measurements used to assess accuracy, 353 (80.8%) met International Organization for Standardization standard 15197: 2003 criteria (within 20% of reference when BG≥4.2mmol/L). The aggregate mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 13.0%, with the MARD for individual sensors ranging from 4.7% to 33.5%. Preremoval ultrasounds detected clinically insignificant intravascular thrombus in five of 21 patients (23.8%). No sensor interfered with clinical care, haemodynamic monitoring or blood sampling. There were no device related serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In this product development study, use of the GluCath system for 24 hours after cardiac surgery had no adverse effect on haemodynamic monitoring, arterial blood sampling or clinical care. Overall accuracy was acceptable in the context of the first phase of a product development study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24588437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Resusc        ISSN: 1441-2772            Impact factor:   2.159


  5 in total

Review 1.  Why Have So Many Intravascular Glucose Monitoring Devices Failed?

Authors:  John L Smith; Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07

2.  Use of an Intravascular Fluorescent Continuous Glucose Sensor in ICU Patients.

Authors:  Paul J Strasma; Simon Finfer; Oliver Flower; Brian Hipszer; Mikhail Kosiborod; Lewis Macken; Marjolein Sechterberger; Peter H J van der Voort; J Hans DeVries; Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-12

Review 3.  Vascular Glucose Sensor Symposium: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) for Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients at Risk for Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, and Glycemic Variability.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph; Marc C Torjman; Paul J Strasma
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-15

4.  Accuracy of Intra-arterial and Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients in the ICU.

Authors:  Marjolein K Sechterberger; Peter H J van der Voort; Paul J Strasma; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-23

5.  Accuracy and stability of an arterial sensor for glucose monitoring in a porcine model using glucose clamp technique.

Authors:  Felix Aberer; Verena Theiler-Schwetz; Haris Ziko; Bettina Hausegger; Iris Wiederstein-Grasser; Daniel A Hochfellner; Philipp Eller; Georg Tomberger; Martin Ellmerer; Julia K Mader; Vladimir Bubalo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.