PURPOSE: To improve accuracy and efficiency in quantifying the endothelial cell loss (ECL) in eye bank preparation of corneal endothelial grafts. METHODS: Eight cadaveric corneas were subjected to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation. The endothelial surfaces were stained with a viability stain, calcein AM dye (CAM) and then captured by a digital camera. The ECL rates were quantified in these images by three separate readers using trainable segmentation, a plug-in feature from the imaging software, Fiji. Images were also analyzed by Adobe Photoshop for comparison. Mean times required to process the images were measured between the two modalities. RESULTS: The mean ECL (with standard deviation) as analyzed by Fiji was 22.5% (6.5%) and Adobe was 18.7% (7.0%; p = 0.04). The mean time required to process the images through the two different imaging methods was 19.9 min (7.5) for Fiji and 23.4 min (12.9) for Adobe (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Establishing an accurate, efficient and reproducible means of quantifying ECL in graft preparation and surgical techniques can provide insight to the safety, long-term potential of the graft tissues as well as provide a quality control measure for eye banks and surgeons. Trainable segmentation in Fiji software using CAM is a novel approach to measuring ECL that captured a statistically significantly higher percentage of ECL comparable to Adobe and was more accurate in standardized testing. Interestingly, ECL as determined using both methods in eye bank-prepared DMEK grafts exceeded 18% on average.
PURPOSE: To improve accuracy and efficiency in quantifying the endothelial cell loss (ECL) in eye bank preparation of corneal endothelial grafts. METHODS: Eight cadaveric corneas were subjected to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation. The endothelial surfaces were stained with a viability stain, calcein AM dye (CAM) and then captured by a digital camera. The ECL rates were quantified in these images by three separate readers using trainable segmentation, a plug-in feature from the imaging software, Fiji. Images were also analyzed by Adobe Photoshop for comparison. Mean times required to process the images were measured between the two modalities. RESULTS: The mean ECL (with standard deviation) as analyzed by Fiji was 22.5% (6.5%) and Adobe was 18.7% (7.0%; p = 0.04). The mean time required to process the images through the two different imaging methods was 19.9 min (7.5) for Fiji and 23.4 min (12.9) for Adobe (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Establishing an accurate, efficient and reproducible means of quantifying ECL in graft preparation and surgical techniques can provide insight to the safety, long-term potential of the graft tissues as well as provide a quality control measure for eye banks and surgeons. Trainable segmentation in Fiji software using CAM is a novel approach to measuring ECL that captured a statistically significantly higher percentage of ECL comparable to Adobe and was more accurate in standardized testing. Interestingly, ECL as determined using both methods in eye bank-prepared DMEK grafts exceeded 18% on average.
Authors: Lucas M M Vianna; Christopher G Stoeger; Joshua D Galloway; Mark Terry; Leslie Cope; Rubens Belfort; Albert S Jun Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Kali Barnes; Eric Chiang; Conan Chen; John Lohmeier; Jason Christy; Akash Chaurasia; Allison Rosen; Parth Vora; Stephanie Cai; Anshul Subramanya; Nicholas Durr; Robert Allen; Allen Omid Eghrari Journal: Cornea Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Jason Hooton; Kyeong Hwan Kim; Stephen I Lentz; Nicholas Hicks; Kayla Jones; Kristen McCoy; Shahzad I Mian Journal: Cornea Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Annekatrin Rickmann; Karl Boden; Silke Wahl; Andre Trouvain; Andre Schulz; Peter Szurman Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Meraf A Wolle; David L DeMill; Lauren Johnson; Stephen I Lentz; Maria A Woodward; Shahzad I Mian Journal: Cornea Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Yogesh Bhadange; Jeferson Lautert; Shimin Li; Edward Lawando; Edward T Kim; Mark C Soper; Francis W Price; Marianne O Price; Joseph A Bonanno Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Colin E Willoughby; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 4.638