Literature DB >> 24588207

Imaging and quantification of endothelial cell loss in eye bank prepared DMEK grafts using trainable segmentation software.

Griffin J Jardine1, Jeffrey D Holiman, Christopher G Stoeger, Winston D Chamberlain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To improve accuracy and efficiency in quantifying the endothelial cell loss (ECL) in eye bank preparation of corneal endothelial grafts.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric corneas were subjected to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation. The endothelial surfaces were stained with a viability stain, calcein AM dye (CAM) and then captured by a digital camera. The ECL rates were quantified in these images by three separate readers using trainable segmentation, a plug-in feature from the imaging software, Fiji. Images were also analyzed by Adobe Photoshop for comparison. Mean times required to process the images were measured between the two modalities.
RESULTS: The mean ECL (with standard deviation) as analyzed by Fiji was 22.5% (6.5%) and Adobe was 18.7% (7.0%; p = 0.04). The mean time required to process the images through the two different imaging methods was 19.9 min (7.5) for Fiji and 23.4 min (12.9) for Adobe (p = 0.17).
CONCLUSIONS: Establishing an accurate, efficient and reproducible means of quantifying ECL in graft preparation and surgical techniques can provide insight to the safety, long-term potential of the graft tissues as well as provide a quality control measure for eye banks and surgeons. Trainable segmentation in Fiji software using CAM is a novel approach to measuring ECL that captured a statistically significantly higher percentage of ECL comparable to Adobe and was more accurate in standardized testing. Interestingly, ECL as determined using both methods in eye bank-prepared DMEK grafts exceeded 18% on average.

Keywords:  Corneal transplant surgery; Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty; endothelial cell loss; eye bank; trainable segmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24588207     DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2014.887120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  12 in total

1.  Risk factors for eye bank preparation failure of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue.

Authors:  Lucas M M Vianna; Christopher G Stoeger; Joshua D Galloway; Mark Terry; Leslie Cope; Rubens Belfort; Albert S Jun
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Viability of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts Folded in the Eye Bank.

Authors:  John Lohmeier; Jason Christy; Eric Chiang; Kali Barnes; Stephanie Cai; Conan Chen; Anshul Subramanya; Akash Chaurasia; Allison Rosen; Parth Vora; Nicholas J Durr; Robert Allen; Allen Omid Eghrari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Comparison of Tri-folded and Scroll-based Graft Viability in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Kali Barnes; Eric Chiang; Conan Chen; John Lohmeier; Jason Christy; Akash Chaurasia; Allison Rosen; Parth Vora; Stephanie Cai; Anshul Subramanya; Nicholas Durr; Robert Allen; Allen Omid Eghrari
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Safety of Long-Term Storage and Shipping of Prestripped, Prestained, and Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue.

Authors:  Jason Hooton; Kyeong Hwan Kim; Stephen I Lentz; Nicholas Hicks; Kayla Jones; Kristen McCoy; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes after precut DMEK with or without dextran-containing medium compared to standard DMEK: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Karl Boden; Silke Wahl; Andre Trouvain; Andre Schulz; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts.

Authors:  Meraf A Wolle; David L DeMill; Lauren Johnson; Stephen I Lentz; Maria A Woodward; Shahzad I Mian
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Hypoxia and the Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor FG-4592 Protect Corneal Endothelial Cells From Mechanical and Perioperative Surgical Stress.

Authors:  Yogesh Bhadange; Jeferson Lautert; Shimin Li; Edward Lawando; Edward T Kim; Mark C Soper; Francis W Price; Marianne O Price; Joseph A Bonanno
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty During the Surgeon Learning Curve Versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Performed at the Same Time.

Authors:  Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Shashi Alloju; Winston Chamberlain
Journal:  J Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-21

9.  Comparison of preservation and transportation protocols for preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Colin E Willoughby; Stefano Ferrari; Diego Ponzin; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Global cell-by-cell evaluation of endothelial viability after two methods of graft preparation in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Maninder Bhogal; Maria S Balda; Karl Matter; Bruce D Allan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.