Hélène Blasco1, Lydie Nadal-Desbarats, Pierre-François Pradat, Paul H Gordon, Catherine Antar, Charlotte Veyrat-Durebex, Caroline Moreau, David Devos, Sylvie Mavel, Patrick Emond, Christian R Andres, Philippe Corcia. 1. From UMR Inserm U930 (H.B., L.N.-D., C.A., C.V.-D., S.M., P.E., C.R.A., P.C.), Tours; Université François-Rabelais (H.B., L.N.-D., C.A., C.V.-D., S.M., P.E., C.R.A., P.C.), Tours; Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire (H.B., C.A., P.E., C.R.A.), CHRU de Tours; PPF-ASB (L.N.-D., P.E.), Université François-Rabelais, Tours; Fédération des Maladies du Système Nerveux (P.-F.P., P.H.G.), Centre Référent Maladie Rare SLA, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris; Service de Neurologie (C.M., D.D.), CHRU de Lille; and Centre SLA (P.C.), Service de Neurologie, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop a CSF metabolomics signature for motor neuron disease (MND) using (1)H-NMR spectroscopy and to evaluate the predictive value of the profile in a separate cohort. METHODS: We collected CSF from patients with MND and controls and analyzed the samples using (1)H-NMR spectroscopy. We divided the total patient sample in a 4:1 ratio into a training cohort and a test cohort. First, a metabolomics signature was created by statistical modeling in the training cohort, and then the analyses tested the predictive value of the signature in the test cohort. We conducted 10 independent trials for each step. Finally, we identified the compounds that contributed most consistently to the metabolome profile. RESULTS: Analysis of CSF from 95 patients and 86 controls identified a diagnostic profile for MND (R(2)X > 22%, R(2)Y > 93%, Q(2) > 66%). The best model selected the correct diagnosis with mean probability of 99.31% in the training cohort. The profile discriminated between diagnostic groups with 78.9% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity in the test cohort. Metabolites linked to pathophysiologic pathways in MND (i.e., threonine, histidine, and molecules related to the metabolism of branched amino acids) were among the discriminant compounds. CONCLUSION:CSF metabolomics using (1)H-NMR spectroscopy can detect a reproducible metabolic signature for MND with reasonable performance. To our knowledge, this is the first metabolomics study that shows that a validation in separate cohorts is feasible. These data should be considered in future biomarker studies. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that CSF metabolomics accurately distinguishes MNDs from other neurologic diseases.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To develop a CSF metabolomics signature for motor neuron disease (MND) using (1)H-NMR spectroscopy and to evaluate the predictive value of the profile in a separate cohort. METHODS: We collected CSF from patients with MND and controls and analyzed the samples using (1)H-NMR spectroscopy. We divided the total patient sample in a 4:1 ratio into a training cohort and a test cohort. First, a metabolomics signature was created by statistical modeling in the training cohort, and then the analyses tested the predictive value of the signature in the test cohort. We conducted 10 independent trials for each step. Finally, we identified the compounds that contributed most consistently to the metabolome profile. RESULTS: Analysis of CSF from 95 patients and 86 controls identified a diagnostic profile for MND (R(2)X > 22%, R(2)Y > 93%, Q(2) > 66%). The best model selected the correct diagnosis with mean probability of 99.31% in the training cohort. The profile discriminated between diagnostic groups with 78.9% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity in the test cohort. Metabolites linked to pathophysiologic pathways in MND (i.e., threonine, histidine, and molecules related to the metabolism of branched amino acids) were among the discriminant compounds. CONCLUSION:CSF metabolomics using (1)H-NMR spectroscopy can detect a reproducible metabolic signature for MND with reasonable performance. To our knowledge, this is the first metabolomics study that shows that a validation in separate cohorts is feasible. These data should be considered in future biomarker studies. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that CSF metabolomics accurately distinguishes MNDs from other neurologic diseases.
Authors: H Blasco; C Veyrat-Durebex; M Bertrand; F Patin; F Labarthe; H Henique; P Emond; C R Andres; C Antar; C Landon; L Nadal-Desbarats; F Maillot Journal: JIMD Rep Date: 2016-06-15
Authors: Charlotte Veyrat-Durebex; Philippe Corcia; Eric Piver; David Devos; Audrey Dangoumau; Flore Gouel; Patrick Vourc'h; Patrick Emond; Frédéric Laumonnier; Lydie Nadal-Desbarats; Paul H Gordon; Christian R Andres; Hélène Blasco Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Kjetil Bjornevik; Zhongli Zhang; Éilis J O'Reilly; James D Berry; Clary B Clish; Amy Deik; Sarah Jeanfavre; Ikuko Kato; Rachel S Kelly; Laurence N Kolonel; Liming Liang; Loic Le Marchand; Marjorie L McCullough; Sabrina Paganoni; Kerry A Pierce; Michael A Schwarzschild; Aladdin H Shadyab; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Dong D Wang; Ying Wang; JoAnn E Manson; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Scott P Allen; Benjamin Hall; Ryan Woof; Laura Francis; Noemi Gatto; Allan C Shaw; Monika Myszczynska; Jordan Hemingway; Ian Coldicott; Amelia Willcock; Lucy Job; Rachel M Hughes; Camilla Boschian; Nadhim Bayatti; Paul R Heath; Oliver Bandmann; Heather Mortiboys; Laura Ferraiuolo; Pamela J Shaw Journal: Brain Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Kjetil Bjornevik; Éilis J O'Reilly; James D Berry; Clary B Clish; Sarah Jeanfavre; Ikuko Kato; Laurence N Kolonel; Loic Le Marchand; Marjorie L McCullough; Sabrina Paganoni; Michael A Schwarzschild; Evelyn O Talbott; Robert B Wallace; Zhongli Zhang; JoAnn E Manson; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Elizabeth Gray; James R Larkin; Tim D W Claridge; Kevin Talbot; Nicola R Sibson; Martin R Turner Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 4.092