| Literature DB >> 26121274 |
Elizabeth Gray1, James R Larkin2, Tim D W Claridge3, Kevin Talbot1, Nicola R Sibson2, Martin R Turner1.
Abstract
Neurochemical biomarkers are urgently sought in ALS. Metabolomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using proton nuclear magnetic resonance ((1)H-NMR) spectroscopy is a highly sensitive method capable of revealing nervous system cellular pathology. The (1)H-NMR CSF metabolomic signature of ALS was sought in a longitudinal cohort. Six-monthly serial collection was performed in ALS patients across a range of clinical sub-types (n = 41) for up to two years, and in healthy controls at a single time-point (n = 14). A multivariate statistical approach, partial least squares discriminant analysis, was used to determine differences between the NMR spectra from patients and controls. Significantly predictive models were found using those patients with at least one year's interval between recruitment and the second sample. Glucose, lactate, citric acid and, unexpectedly, ethanol were the discriminating metabolites elevated in ALS. It is concluded that (1)H-NMR captured the CSF metabolomic signature associated with derangements in cellular energy utilization connected with ALS, and was most prominent in comparisons using patients with longer disease duration. The specific metabolites identified support the concept of a hypercatabolic state, possibly involving mitochondrial dysfunction specifically. Endogenous ethanol in the CSF may be an unrecognized novel marker of neuronal tissue injury in ALS.Entities:
Keywords: Nuclear magnetic resonance; biomarker; motor neuron disease; neurochemical; proton
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26121274 PMCID: PMC4720042 DOI: 10.3109/21678421.2015.1053490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener ISSN: 2167-8421 Impact factor: 4.092
Figure 1. Schematic demonstrating the experimental design.
Figure 2. Example 1H NMR spectrum of CSF from an ALS patient with key metabolites identified.
Characteristics of patients with ALS, PLS and controls.
| ALS patient groups | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥ Baseline ( | ≥ 6 months ( | ≥ 12 months ( | ≥ 18 months ( | ≥ 24 months ( | PLS ( | Controls ( | |
| Gender, | |||||||
| Female | 12 (30%) | 6 (30%) | 4 (28.6%) | 3 (27.3%) | 2 (33.3%) | 4 (80%) | 8 (57.1%) |
| Male | 28 (70%) | 14 (70%) | 10 (71.4%) | 8 (72.7%) | 4 (66.7%) | 1 (20%) | 6 (42.9%) |
| Age (y) | 62.2 ± 10.4* | 60.9 ± 11.0 | 58.8 ± 10.8 | 56.1 ± 9.3 | 55.7 ± 11.0 | 70.2 ± 6.7 | 53.2 ± 8.9 |
| Disease duration (months) | 37.8 ± 32.7 | 53.2 ± 35.0 | 66.7 ± 33.3 | 71.7 ± 35.9 | 85.4 ± 38.5 | 162.5 ± 79.4 | N/A |
| ALSFRS-R | 30.7 ± 8.3 | 25.3 ± 7.0 | 25.3 ± 4.8 | 25.9 ± 4.9 | 25.5 ± 4.9 | 25.8 ± 6.2 | N/A |
| Progression rate | 0.9 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.07 | N/A |
| CSF | |||||||
| Glucose (mM) | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| Protein (mg/ml) | 0.97 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.98 | 0.95 |
*p < 0.05 ≥ Baseline compared to controls. Values are mean ± SD.
Figure 3. PLS-DA model plots. In each plot, the x-axis indicates patient number while the y-axis indicates discrimination for the model's component. (A) PLS-DA plot of CSF samples comparing ALS patients for whom the most advanced sample is greater than or equal to baseline (filled black triangles) and control volunteers (open black circles). (B) PLS-DA plot of CSF samples comparing ALS patients for whom the most advanced sample is greater than or equal to six months (filled black diamonds) and control volunteers (open black circles). (C) PLS-DA plot of CSF samples comparing ALS patients for whom the most advanced sample is greater than or equal to twelve months (filled black circles) and control volunteers (open black circles). (D) PLS-DA plot of CSF samples comparing ALS patients for whom the most advanced sample is greater than or equal to 18 months (filled black squares) and control volunteers (open black circles). (E) PLS-DA plot of CSF samples comparing ALS patients for whom the most advanced sample is greater than or equal to 24 (inverted filled black triangles) and control volunteers (open black circles). (F) Graph to show the q 2-values of the models and their corresponding sample size.
Metabolite changes relative to control for metabolites of interest in the models.
| Ctrl | ALS ≥ 06 | ALS ≥ 12 | ALS ≥ 18 | > 5 years | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolite | Bucket region | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| Lactic acid | [1.32...1.34] + [4.10...4.14] | 1.00 | 0.14 | 1.22 | 0.16 | 1.22 | 0.16 | 1.21 | 0.18 | 1.23 | 0.19 |
| Citric acid | [2.64...2.66] | 1.00 | 0.17 | 1.39 | 0.23 | 1.39 | 0.26 | 1.36 | 0.29 | 1.31 | 0.26 |
| Glucose | [3.24...3.28] + [3.38...3.44] + [3.46...3.52] + [3.54...3.56] + [3.70...3.80] + [3.82...3.86] + [3.88...3.92] | 1.00 | 0.08 | 1.17 | 0.18 | 1.19 | 0.19 | 1.20 | 0.21 | 1.18 | 0.15 |
| Ethanol | [1.18...1.20] + [3.66...3.68] | 1.00 | 0.09 | 1.31 | 0.38 | 1.30 | 0.36 | 1.18 | 0.10 | 1.17 | 0.14 |
Figure 4. Relative abundance of metabolites, normalized to control and determined by summed integral from the regions indicated in Table II. Data are means ± SD. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001 all relative to control values.