| Literature DB >> 24587236 |
Priti Bahety1, Yee Min Tan1, Yanjun Hong1, Luqi Zhang1, Eric Chun Yong Chan1, Pui-Lai Rachel Ee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the significant amount of work being carried out to investigate the therapeutic potential of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in Alzheimer's disease (AD), the mechanism by which DHA affects amyloid-β precursor protein (AβPP)-induced metabolic changes has not been studied.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24587236 PMCID: PMC3937442 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Model validation for CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 cells and effect of DHA on Aβ40 release.
(A) Conditioned medium was collected from CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 cells with and without DHA treatment and subjected to ELISA immunoassays for Aβ40. There was negligible release of Aβ40 from CHO-wt cells as compared to CHO-AβPP695 cells at 24 and 48 h. A significant decrease was observed in the release of Aβ40 in CHO-AβPP695 cells after treatment with 25 µM DHA for 24 h and 48 h. # p<0.001 as compared to CHO-wt vehicle treated cells, φ p<0.05 compared to CHO-AβPP695 24 h vehicle treatment and § p<0.001 as compared to CHO-AβPP695 48 h vehicle treatment. Analysis was done via ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc analysis. (B) Western blot analysis of the cell lysates confirm AβPP695 plasmid overexpression in CHO-AβPP695 cells compared to CHO-wt.
Figure 2Overlay of GC/TOFMS chromatograms.
(A) Representative GC/TOFMS chromatogram of DHA-treated and vehicle-treated CHO-AβPP695 cells – lysate (L) and medium (M) samples (B) Representative chromatogram demonstrating discriminatory metabolites between vehicle-treated and DHA-treated CHO-wt cells and CHO-AβPP695 cells.
Figure 3PLS-DA score plot and validation plot for lysate samples.
(A) PLS-DA score plot of vehicle-treated CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 lysate samples (R2X = 0.474; R2Y = 0.985; Q2 (cum) = 0.808; LV = 2); (B) Validation plot of the PLS-DA model obtained from 100 permutation tests for vehicle-treated lysate samples; (C) PLS-DA score plot of DHA-treated CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 lysate samples (R2X = 0.645; R2Y = 0.993; Q2 (cum) = 0.971; LV = 2); (D) Validation plot of the PLS-DA model obtained from 100 permutation tests for DHA-treated lysate samples.
Figure 4PLS-DA score plot and validation plot for medium samples.
(A) PLS-DA score plot of vehicle-treated CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 medium samples (R2X = 0.679; R2Y = 0.994; Q2 (cum) = 0.929; LV = 3); (B) Validation plot of the PLS-DA model obtained from 100 permutation tests for vehicle-treated medium samples; (C) PLS-DA score plot of DHA-treated CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 medium samples (R2X = 0.745; R2Y = 0.992; Q2 (cum) = 0.885; LV = 3); (D) Validation plot of the PLS-DA model obtained from 100 permutation tests for DHA-treated medium samples.
Discriminatory marker metabolites identified from medium and lysate samples of DHA-treated and vehicle-treated CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 cells.
| Metabolite | Sample | Chemical class | Kovats RI | Vehicle-treated | DHA-treated | ||||
| Normalized peak area (×10−4) | Fold Δ | Normalized peak area (×10−4) | Fold Δ | ||||||
| CHO-wt | CHO-AβPP695 | CHO-wt | CHO-AβPP695 | ||||||
| Citric acid | lysate | TCA | 1844.5 | 7.5±0.9 | 8.4±3.3 | 1.12 | 16.6±1.5 | 33.0±2.4 | 1.99 |
| Malic acid | lysate | TCA | 1501.6 | 20.5±1.5 | 21.6±1.3ns | 1.05 | 16.6±0.9 | 25.3±1.7 | 1.52 |
| DHA | lysate | Fatty acid | 2552.3 | 3.2±1.4 | 2.5±0.7 | 0.79 | 3.5±0.2 | 4.5±0.3 | 1.28 |
| Arachidonic acid | lysate | Fatty acid | 2352.8 | 3.1±0.3 | 3.5±0.4 | 1.17 | 3.2±0.1 | 2.7±0.3 | 0.85 |
| Zymosterol | lysate | Steroid | 3170.0 | 4.3±0.4 | 7.6±0.9 | 1.76 | 4.2±0.3 | 6.6±0.7 | 1.59 |
| Cholesta-3,5-diene | lysate | Steroid | 2885.6 | 3.0±0.3 | 3.1±0.4 ns | 1.05 | 3.0±0.4 | 1.5±0.5 | 0.52 |
| Succinic acid | medium | TCA | 1305.9 | 3.2±0.5 | 3.5±0.1ns | 1.09 | 3.4±0.3 | 4.1±0.3 | 1.20 |
| Malic acid | medium | TCA | 1501.6 | 1.3±0.1 | 1.2±0.3ns | 0.92 | 1.4±0.1 | 1.6±0.1 | 1.17 |
| Glycine | medium | Amino acid | 1316.1 | 80.8±20.9 | 102.1±29.4ns | 1.30 | 181.4±58.3 | 284.6±47.6 | 1.56 |
Metabolite identification using standard compound.
Metabolite identification using NIST library search.
Normalized peak area values expressed as mean ± S.E.M.
Fold change (Δ): CHO-AβPP695 (treatment)/CHO-wt (treatment).
*p<0.05 and ns not significant when calculated using the independent t-test with Welch’s correction for normalized peak area of CHO-AβPP695 cells compared to CHO-wt cells for respective treatment groups.
Abbreviations: DHA – docosahexaenoic acid, TCA – tricarboxylic acid.
Metabolites, their associated metabolic pathways and biological relevance in AD.
| Metabolites | Metabolic pathway | Biological relevance in AD |
| Citric acid (↓) | TCA cycle | Deregulation of TCA cycle, hypometabolism and increased oxidative damages |
| Succinic acid (↓) | TCA cycle | Deregulation of TCA cycle, hypometabolism and increased oxidative damages |
| Malic acid (↓) | TCA cycle | Deregulation of TCA cycle, hypometabolism and increased oxidative damages |
| Glycine (↓) | Amino acid metabolism | Required for synthesis of heme which is essential for functioning of electron transport chain |
| Zymosterol (↑) | Steroid biosynthesis | Increased risk of formation and deposition of amyloid beta plaques from APP |
| Arachidonic acid (↑) | Eicosanoid biosynthesis | Generation of pro-inflammatory and inflammatory mediators in AD |
| DHA (↓) | Fatty acid biosynthesis | Affects neuroprotection, successful aging, memory and inflammation resolving properties |
Metabolites are grouped together on the basis of their biological relevance. (↑) elevated in AD and (↓) reduced in AD.
Related to metabolites using KEGG database.
Abbreviations: DHA – docosahexaenoic acid, TCA – tricarboxylic acid.
Figure 5DHA treatment increases pyruvate dehydrogenase enzyme concentration in CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 cells.
Pyruvate dehydrogenase activity in CHO-wt and CHO-AβPP695 cells treated with vehicle or 25 µM DHA. Values are means ± SEM from three independent experiments. **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 as compared to CHO-AβPP695 vehicle treated. Analysis was done via ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-hoc analysis.