Angela Ka Ying Mak1, Shirley S Ho, Hyo Jung Kim. 1. School of Media Film and Journalism, Monash University, Berwick Campus Building 903, Melbourne, VIC, 3806, Australia, angela.mak@monash.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite the growing importance of cancer and return-to-work issues in occupational rehabilitation literature in the last decade, academic discussion is largely limited to survivors' perspectives and some exploratory studies from the employer side. This paper applies two classic theoretical models-Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory-and key measures from previous studies to identify explicit relationships that explain employer factors to hire and retain cancer survivors. METHODS: Data were collected from online surveys with senior management executives and senior human resource specialists from various organizations in Singapore, with a total of 145 responses. The 72-item survey instrument included a series of independent variables: (1) Attitudes toward cancer and cancer survivors; (2) Employers' efficacy; (3) Perceived moral obligation; (4) Employers' experience; (5) Outcome expectations; (6) Employment situation; (7) Social norms; and (8) Incentives, and dependent variables: (a) Employers' intention to hire cancer survivors; and (b) Employers' intention to retain cancer survivors. RESULTS: Regression analyses showed that the top three factors related to employers' intention to retain cancer survivors are perceived moral obligations (β = .39, p < .001), followed by attitudes toward cancer (β = .25, p < .01), and employment situation (β = .17, p < .05). Employers' efficacy was associated with intention to hire (β = .22, p < .05), coupled with attitude toward cancer survivors (β = .22, p < .01). The findings also indicated the important role of existing relationship between an employer and an employee when it comes to retaining cancer survivors and government incentives for hiring cancer survivors in the workforce. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided an avenue to implement the proposed model-a potential study framework for the management of cancer survivors at work. Findings revealed that different messages should be tailored to employers toward hiring and retention issues and provided useful guidelines for employer education materials.
PURPOSE: Despite the growing importance of cancer and return-to-work issues in occupational rehabilitation literature in the last decade, academic discussion is largely limited to survivors' perspectives and some exploratory studies from the employer side. This paper applies two classic theoretical models-Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theory-and key measures from previous studies to identify explicit relationships that explain employer factors to hire and retain cancer survivors. METHODS: Data were collected from online surveys with senior management executives and senior human resource specialists from various organizations in Singapore, with a total of 145 responses. The 72-item survey instrument included a series of independent variables: (1) Attitudes toward cancer and cancer survivors; (2) Employers' efficacy; (3) Perceived moral obligation; (4) Employers' experience; (5) Outcome expectations; (6) Employment situation; (7) Social norms; and (8) Incentives, and dependent variables: (a) Employers' intention to hire cancer survivors; and (b) Employers' intention to retain cancer survivors. RESULTS: Regression analyses showed that the top three factors related to employers' intention to retain cancer survivors are perceived moral obligations (β = .39, p < .001), followed by attitudes toward cancer (β = .25, p < .01), and employment situation (β = .17, p < .05). Employers' efficacy was associated with intention to hire (β = .22, p < .05), coupled with attitude toward cancer survivors (β = .22, p < .01). The findings also indicated the important role of existing relationship between an employer and an employee when it comes to retaining cancer survivors and government incentives for hiring cancer survivors in the workforce. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided an avenue to implement the proposed model-a potential study framework for the management of cancer survivors at work. Findings revealed that different messages should be tailored to employers toward hiring and retention issues and provided useful guidelines for employer education materials.
Authors: Michael Feuerstein; Briana L Todd; Michal C Moskowitz; Gina L Bruns; Mallori R Stoler; Thomas Nassif; Xinhua Yu Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: E Voogt; A van der Heide; A F van Leeuwen; A P Visser; M P H D Cleiren; J Passchier; P J van der Maas Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Niraj J Gusani; Jane R Schubart; James Wise; Elana Farace; Michael J Green; Yixing Jiang; Eric T Kimchi; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.128