Angela Ka Ying Mak1. 1. Wee Kim Wee School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University, 31 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637718, Singapore. angelamak@ntu.edu.sg.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cancer and return to work has been extensively studied in the Western context and yet it has not received much academic attention in Asia. This paper aims to review the current Singapore government rehabilitation initiatives in collaboration with the policy community, identify the socio-environmental barriers to implementing the existing programs for cancer survivors, highlights the demand-side of research development and illustrates the viewpoints of small and medium enterprise employers in Singapore from a recent study. Implications and future directions in developing evidence-based rehabilitation policies and initiatives for cancer survivors in Singapore and the Southeast Asian region are also discussed. METHODS: A review of occupational rehabilitation literature relevant to Singapore looking at legislation, policies, initiatives and services was performed. Current state-of-art research in occupational rehabilitation from an employer perspective was also synthesized. RESULTS: Challenges and barriers of adopting the current rehabilitation initiatives and programs for cancer survivors exist largely due to the lack of centralized effort, clear definitions and understanding between people with disabilities, chronic illness and cancer as well as an evidence-based policy community. In addition, too much emphasis on new hiring than retaining in current services and there are no specific guidelines to help employers deal with issues when retaining employees with health history, such as workplace accommodation, appraisal, discrimination and grievance handling. CONCLUSIONS: Palpable blind spots in the current occupational rehabilitation system and policy were highlighted in this paper. Coupled with systemic improvements, continuous government resource support and developing an evidence-based policy community between the government, employers, healthcare professionals, industry and community partners and non-profit organizations, a positive change of the rehabilitation initiatives and services is promising.
INTRODUCTION:Cancer and return to work has been extensively studied in the Western context and yet it has not received much academic attention in Asia. This paper aims to review the current Singapore government rehabilitation initiatives in collaboration with the policy community, identify the socio-environmental barriers to implementing the existing programs for cancer survivors, highlights the demand-side of research development and illustrates the viewpoints of small and medium enterprise employers in Singapore from a recent study. Implications and future directions in developing evidence-based rehabilitation policies and initiatives for cancer survivors in Singapore and the Southeast Asian region are also discussed. METHODS: A review of occupational rehabilitation literature relevant to Singapore looking at legislation, policies, initiatives and services was performed. Current state-of-art research in occupational rehabilitation from an employer perspective was also synthesized. RESULTS: Challenges and barriers of adopting the current rehabilitation initiatives and programs for cancer survivors exist largely due to the lack of centralized effort, clear definitions and understanding between people with disabilities, chronic illness and cancer as well as an evidence-based policy community. In addition, too much emphasis on new hiring than retaining in current services and there are no specific guidelines to help employers deal with issues when retaining employees with health history, such as workplace accommodation, appraisal, discrimination and grievance handling. CONCLUSIONS: Palpable blind spots in the current occupational rehabilitation system and policy were highlighted in this paper. Coupled with systemic improvements, continuous government resource support and developing an evidence-based policy community between the government, employers, healthcare professionals, industry and community partners and non-profit organizations, a positive change of the rehabilitation initiatives and services is promising.
Authors: Patricia A Ganz; Katherine A Desmond; Beth Leedham; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Thomas R Belin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-01-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Michael Feuerstein; Briana L Todd; Michal C Moskowitz; Gina L Bruns; Mallori R Stoler; Thomas Nassif; Xinhua Yu Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jill A Bennett; Paul Brown; Linda Cameron; Lisa C Whitehead; David Porter; Katherine M McPherson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jenny W Y Pang; Debra L Friedman; John A Whitton; Marilyn Stovall; Ann C Mertens; Leslie L Robison; Noel S Weiss Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Elise Martin; Antonio Di Meglio; Gwenn Menvielle; Johanna Arvis; Aurélie Bourmaud; Stefan Michiels; Barbara Pistilli; Ines Vaz-Luis; Agnès Dumas Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Sietske J Tamminga; Marije D J Wolvers; Michiel A Greidanus; AnneClaire G N M Zaman; Anna M Braspenning; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Angela G E M de Boer Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2019-06
Authors: Sietske J Tamminga; Anna M Braspenning; Anna Haste; Linda Sharp; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Angela G E M de Boer Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2019-09