Literature DB >> 24583725

Risk factors for missed dynamic canal stenosis in the cervical spine.

Tetsuo Hayashi1, Jeffrey C Wang, Akinobu Suzuki, Shinji Takahashi, Trevor P Scott, Kevin Phan, Elizabeth L Lord, Monchai Ruangchainikom, Keiichiro Shiba, Michael D Daubs.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of kinematic magnetic resonance (MR) images.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the distribution and risk factors associated with missed dynamic stenosis in cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Motion of the cervical spine is widely accepted to be associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy; however, the distribution and the risk factors for dynamic spinal stenosis are not well understood.
METHODS: A total of 435 symptomatic patients (2610 cervical segments) obtained upright kinematic MR images in neutral, flexion, and extension postures. Spinal cord compression (SCC), spondylolisthesis, disc bulging, angular motion, translational motion, disc degeneration grade, Modic changes, segmental alignment, and developmental stenosis were all evaluated. Cervical segments C2-C3 to C7-T1 were divided into 2 groups, determined by the presence of SCC. After excluding segments with SCC in the neutral position, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate for associated risk factors of SCC in flexion and extension that were not present in the neutral position.
RESULTS: SCC in neutral position was observed in 5.3% (139/2610) of segments. After excluding these segments, missed dynamic stenosis was found in 8.3% (204/2471) of segments in extension and 1.6% (40/2471) in flexion. Missed dynamic stenosis in both extension and flexion was most frequent at C5-C6. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for dynamic stenosis in extension revealed that disc bulge greater than 2.4 mm, angular motion greater than 4.8°, moderate and severe disc degeneration, segmental kyphosis, and developmental stenosis were significant risk factors. In flexion, significant risk factors were a disc bulge of 1.9 mm or greater, moderate to severe disc degeneration, and segmental kyphosis.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic cord compression was most common at the C5-C6 segment. Cervical segments with greater disc bulge, more severe disc degeneration, greater angular motion, segmental kyphosis, and developmental stenosis may be at risk for missed dynamic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24583725     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Kinematic characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance: a weight-bearing dynamic MRI study.

Authors:  Koji Tamai; Phillip Grisdela; Joshua Romanu; Permsak Paholpak; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical arteriosclerosis is associated with preoperative clinical symptoms in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Gentaro Kumagai; Kanichiro Wada; Sunao Tanaka; Toru Asari; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Risk factors for the development of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Guillaume Baucher; Jelena Taskovic; Lucas Troude; Granit Molliqaj; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of Disc-Associated Cervical Spondylomyelopathy in Doberman Pinschers.

Authors:  M Provencher; A Habing; S A Moore; L Cook; G Phillips; R C da Costa
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  The Role of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  John Paul Kolcun; Lee Onn Chieng; Karthik Madhavan; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-12-07

6.  Modic changes in the cervical endplate of patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Pan Qiao; Tian-Tong Xu; Wen Zhang; Rong Tian
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Spinal sagittal alignment and trapezoidal deformity in patients with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kazuma Murata; Kenji Endo; Hidekazu Suzuki; Yuji Matsuoka; Taichiro Takamatsu; Hirosuke Nishimura; Kengo Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Dynamic Cord Compression Causing Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Andrei Fernandes Joaquim; Griffin R Baum; Lee A Tan; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-07-24

9.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Development and Natural History [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 2].

Authors:  Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore; Granit Molliqaj; Torstein Meling; Karl Schaller; Hiroaki Nakashima; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Josef Bednarik; Allan R Martin; Peter Vajkoczy; Joseph S Cheng; Brian K Kwon; Shekar N Kurpad; Michael G Fehlings; James S Harrop; Bizhan Aarabi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; James D Guest; Benjamin M Davies; Mark R N Kotter; Jefferson R Wilson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-02

10.  A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Changes in Severity of Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Flexion and Extension.

Authors:  Yookyung Lee; Seung Yeun Kim; Keewon Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.