Literature DB >> 24583647

The surface characterization and bioactivity of NANOZR in vitro.

Jian-min Han1, Guang Hong, Hiroyuki Matsui, Yoshinaka Shimizu, Gang Zheng, Hong Lin, Keiichi Sasaki.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface characterization and bioactivity of ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite (NANOZR) in comparison to yttria-stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP) and pure titanium (CpTi). Three-dimension surface morphology, surface wettability, bovine serum albumin adsorption rate, cell morphology, cell proliferation and ALP activity of three tested materials were measured. There were no significant differences in surface roughness, contact angle among the three materials. The ALP expression of NANOZR was higher than CpTi and 3Y-TZP at 14 and 21 days although bovine serum albumin adsorption rate, cell morphology; and cell proliferation was not different among the three materials. These results suggest that the three test materials basically had similar surface characterization and bioactivity. Within the limitations of this study, our results show that the three test materials were biologically similar bio-inert materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24583647     DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2013-188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater J        ISSN: 0287-4547            Impact factor:   2.102


  6 in total

Review 1.  Zirconia surface modifications for implant dentistry.

Authors:  Fernanda H Schünemann; María E Galárraga-Vinueza; Ricardo Magini; Márcio Fredel; Filipe Silva; Júlio C M Souza; Yu Zhang; Bruno Henriques
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 7.328

2.  Surface Characteristics and Bioactivity of Zirconia (Y-TZP) with Different Surface Treatments.

Authors:  Gayathree Alagiriswamy; Chitra Shankar Krishnan; Hariharan Ramakrishnan; Sampath Kumar Jayakrishnakumar; Vallabh Mahadevan; Nagarasampatti Sivaprakasam Azhagarasan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2020-08-28

3.  Biomechanical and histological evaluation of the osseointegration capacity of two types of zirconia implant.

Authors:  Jian-Min Han; Guang Hong; Hong Lin; Yoshinaka Shimizu; Yuhan Wu; Gang Zheng; Hongyu Zhang; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  Initial osteoblast adhesion and subsequent differentiation on zirconia surfaces are regulated by integrins and heparin-sensitive molecule.

Authors:  Feng Luo; Guang Hong; Hiroyuki Matsui; Kosei Endo; Qianbing Wan; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-11-19

Review 5.  Nanostructured Zirconia-Based Ceramics and Composites in Dentistry: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Antonio Arena; Francesca Prete; Elisa Rambaldi; Maria Chiara Bignozzi; Carlo Monaco; Adolfo Di Fiore; Jérôme Chevalier
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconia Dental Implants: 10-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Andrea Enrico Borgonovo; Susanna Ferrario; Carlo Maiorana; Virna Vavassori; Rachele Censi; Dino Re
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.