OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after fresh and vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfers. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic. PATIENT(S): 1,209 infertile patients who underwent a total of 1,157 fresh and 645 vitrified-warmed embryo transfers. INTERVENTION(S): Day-5 single-blastocyst transfers using fresh or vitrified-warmed (Cryotop method) grade I and grade II embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fetal heart pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, gestational age, and live-birth weight. RESULT(S): The overall blastocyst thaw survival rate was 94.4% and was not significantly different between blastocyst grades or developmental stages. Similar clinical outcomes were achieved for fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers; for example, grade I blastocysts had a live-birth rate of 52.8% versus 55.3%, respectively, and grade II blastocysts had a rate of 34.9% versus 30.4%, respectively. Significantly improved neonatal outcomes were evident for vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers for gestational age, being on average 0.3 weeks longer, and for live-birth weight with babies born on average 145 g heavier (3,296 g versus 3,441 g for fresh and vitrified-warmed groups, respectively), as compared with fresh transfers. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after fresh and vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfers. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic. PATIENT(S): 1,209 infertilepatients who underwent a total of 1,157 fresh and 645 vitrified-warmed embryo transfers. INTERVENTION(S): Day-5 single-blastocyst transfers using fresh or vitrified-warmed (Cryotop method) grade I and grade II embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fetal heart pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, gestational age, and live-birth weight. RESULT(S): The overall blastocyst thaw survival rate was 94.4% and was not significantly different between blastocyst grades or developmental stages. Similar clinical outcomes were achieved for fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers; for example, grade I blastocysts had a live-birth rate of 52.8% versus 55.3%, respectively, and grade II blastocysts had a rate of 34.9% versus 30.4%, respectively. Significantly improved neonatal outcomes were evident for vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers for gestational age, being on average 0.3 weeks longer, and for live-birth weight with babies born on average 145 g heavier (3,296 g versus 3,441 g for fresh and vitrified-warmed groups, respectively), as compared with fresh transfers. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
Authors: Ma Luisa López Regalado; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; María Serrano; Luis Martínez; Juan Mozas; Fernando Rodríguez-Serrano; Juan Fontes; Bárbara Romero; Jose A Castilla Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Julia F Litzky; Sheree L Boulet; Navid Esfandiari; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Regan N Theiler; Carmen J Marsit Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 8.661