Literature DB >> 24582521

Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.

Tammie K Roy1, Cara K Bradley2, Mark C Bowman2, Steven J McArthur2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after fresh and vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfers.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic. PATIENT(S): 1,209 infertile patients who underwent a total of 1,157 fresh and 645 vitrified-warmed embryo transfers. INTERVENTION(S): Day-5 single-blastocyst transfers using fresh or vitrified-warmed (Cryotop method) grade I and grade II embryos. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fetal heart pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, gestational age, and live-birth weight. RESULT(S): The overall blastocyst thaw survival rate was 94.4% and was not significantly different between blastocyst grades or developmental stages. Similar clinical outcomes were achieved for fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers; for example, grade I blastocysts had a live-birth rate of 52.8% versus 55.3%, respectively, and grade II blastocysts had a rate of 34.9% versus 30.4%, respectively. Significantly improved neonatal outcomes were evident for vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers for gestational age, being on average 0.3 weeks longer, and for live-birth weight with babies born on average 145 g heavier (3,296 g versus 3,441 g for fresh and vitrified-warmed groups, respectively), as compared with fresh transfers. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; blastocyst; human; single-embryo transfer; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24582521     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  32 in total

1.  Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zhu; Ya-Mei Xue; Ling-Yun Yang; Ling-Ying Jiang; Chao Ling; Xiao-Mei Tong; Song-Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ma Luisa López Regalado; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; María Serrano; Luis Martínez; Juan Mozas; Fernando Rodríguez-Serrano; Juan Fontes; Bárbara Romero; Jose A Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Erica Anspach Will; Alison Bartolucci; John Nulsen; Claudio Benadiva; Lawrence Engmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  The state of "freeze-for-all" in human ARTs.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Frozen embryo transfer can be performed in the cycle immediately following the freeze-all cycle.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts.

Authors:  Alice Tubbing; Chloë Shaw-Jackson; Lieveke Ameye; Jérôme Colin; Serge Rozenberg; Candice Autin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Effect of frozen/thawed embryo transfer on birthweight, macrosomia, and low birthweight rates in US singleton infants.

Authors:  Julia F Litzky; Sheree L Boulet; Navid Esfandiari; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Regan N Theiler; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Quantitative and qualitative trophectoderm grading allows for prediction of live birth and gender.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Katja Tritscher; Richard B Mayer; Peter Oppelt; Hans-Christoph Duba; Maria Maurer; Gudrun Schappacher-Tilp; Erwin Petek; Omar Shebl
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Higher clinical pregnancy rates from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers compared to fresh blastocyst transfers: a retrospective matched-cohort study.

Authors:  Kemal Özgür; Murat Berkkanoğlu; Hasan Bulut; Ayhan Isikli; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.