Literature DB >> 24582469

Within-session repeated a-tDCS: the effects of repetition rate and inter-stimulus interval on corticospinal excitability and motor performance.

A Bastani1, S Jaberzadeh2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of rate and stimulation interval of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) on CSE and motor performance.
METHODS: Twelve healthy individuals participated in this study. CSE was assessed before and after five experimental conditions of one, two or three applications of 10 min of a-tDCS with an interval of 5 or 25 min. a-tDCS was applied with a constant current density of 0.016 mA/cm(2). Purdue pegboard-test was selected for motor performance assessment.
RESULTS: Compared to single 10 min stimulation, the magnitude of the within-session repeated a-tDCS induced excitability was enhanced significantly after the second stimulation was performed with an interval of 25 min, but not 5 min. However, by increasing the number of a-tDCS to three repetitions the CSE was significantly increased and lasted for 2h with both 5 and 25 min intervals. Furthermore, CSE enhancement remained significant for up to 24h for within session a-tDCS repetitions with 25 min intervals. Likewise, significant improvement was seen in motor performance following three times repetition with 25 min inter-stimulus intervals.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that within session repeated a-tDCS with longer intervals within the lasting effects of the previous stimulations are preferable for increasing induced excitability changes with longer lasting effects. SIGNIFICANCE: It is of particular importance to increase the a-tDCS lasting effects to consolidate the neuroplastic CSE changes.
Copyright © 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-invasive brain stimulation; Optimal tDCS parameter; Plasticity; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24582469     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  17 in total

Review 1.  Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive performance in Parkinson's disease mild cognitive impairment? An event-related potentials and neuropsychological assessment study.

Authors:  Serkan Aksu; Atilla Uslu; Pınar İşçen; Emine Elif Tülay; Huzeyfe Barham; Ahmet Zihni Soyata; Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Gülsen Babacan Yıldız; Başar Bilgiç; Haşmet Hanağası; Adam J Woods; Sacit Karamürsel; Fatma Aytül Uyar
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke fatigue.

Authors:  William De Doncker; Sasha Ondobaka; Annapoorna Kuppuswamy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Commentary: Cumulative effects of anodal and priming cathodal tDCS on pegboard test performance and motor cortical excitability.

Authors:  Pierre Besson; Stephane Perrey; Wei-Peng Teo; Makii Muthalib
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Effects of High-Definition Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Applied Simultaneously to Both Primary Motor Cortices on Bimanual Sensorimotor Performance.

Authors:  Nils H Pixa; Fabian Steinberg; Michael Doppelmayr
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Reversed Polarity bi-tDCS over M1 during a Five Days Motor Task Training Did Not Influence Motor Learning. A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Laura Flix-Díez; Miguel Delicado-Miralles; Francisco Gurdiel-Álvarez; Enrique Velasco; María Galán-Calle; Sergio Lerma Lara
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-25

7.  Stimulating somatosensory psychophysics: a double-blind, sham-controlled study of the neurobiological mechanisms of tDCS.

Authors:  Claire J Hanley; Mark Tommerdahl; David J McGonigle
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.505

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation as a memory enhancer in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Bystad; Ole Grønli; Ingrid Daae Rasmussen; Nina Gundersen; Lene Nordvang; Henrik Wang-Iversen; Per M Aslaksen
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 6.982

9.  Commentary: Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Claire J Hanley
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Long-Term Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Executive Function in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Lijuan Huo; Zhiwei Zheng; Jin Li; Wenyu Wan; Xiaoyu Cui; Shuyuan Chen; Wei Wang; Juan Li
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.