Literature DB >> 24581521

A commentary on PSA velocity and doubling time for clinical decisions in prostate cancer.

Andrew J Vickers1, Ian M Thompson2, Eric Klein3, Peter R Carroll4, Peter T Scardino5.   

Abstract

Although the value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity or doubling time has never been seriously questioned for aiding the clinical management of recurrent or advanced cancer, there has historically been considerable uncertainty about PSA kinetics for decisions about biopsy and initial treatment. Recent studies, including analyses of cohorts from all the major randomized trials of localized prostate cancer, have failed to find any evidence that PSA velocity and application of PSA cutpoints are of benefit in this setting. Given current data on PSA velocity and doubling time, we propose the following "take home" messages for the practicing urologist: (1) High PSA velocity is not an indication for biopsy; (2) for men with a low total PSA but a high PSA velocity, consideration should be given to having PSA taken at a shorter interval; (3) men with an indication for biopsy should be biopsied irrespective of PSA velocity; (4) changes in PSA after negative biopsy findings do not determine the need for repeat biopsy; (5) monitoring PSA over time can aid judgment in decisions about biopsy, as informed by the clinical context; (6) PSA velocity is uninformative of risk at diagnosis; (7) high PSA velocity is not an indication for treatment in men on active surveillance; (8) PSA velocity at the time of recurrence should be entered into prediction models (or "nomograms") to aid patient counseling; (9) PSA changes after treatment for advanced disease can help indicate therapeutic response.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24581521     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

Review 1.  Serum markers in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Ola Bratt; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; E Jason Abel; Tracy M Downs; Frederick Kelcz; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  What's new in screening in 2015?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  The use of multiphase nonlinear mixed models to define and quantify long-term changes in serum prostate-specific antigen: data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Azza Shoaibi; Gowtham A Rao; Bo Cai; John Rawl; James R Hébert
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Serum C-reactive protein acted as a prognostic biomarker for overall survival in metastatic prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Liuyu Xu; Qingli Zhao; Shengliang Huang; Shun Li; Jin Wang; Qing Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-07

6.  Use of radiobiology in medical jurisprudence, with particular reference to delays in diagnosis and therapeutic onset.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Nanocytological field carcinogenesis detection to mitigate overdiagnosis of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Charles B Brendler; Hariharan Subramanian; Di Zhang; Charles Maneval; John Chandler; Leah Bowen; Karen L Kaul; Brian T Helfand; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Margo Quinn; Jacqueline Petkewicz; Michael Paterakos; Vadim Backman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Biomarkers for prostate cancer: present challenges and future opportunities.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Julio M Pow-Sang
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2015-12-17

9.  Prognostic Role of the Pretreatment C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Solid Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nan Li; Guang-Wei Tian; Ying Wang; Hui Zhang; Zi-Hui Wang; Guang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?

Authors:  Kimia Kohestani; Marina Chilov; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.