| Literature DB >> 24581278 |
Atif Ali Hashmi, Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi, Hanna Naqvi, Naveen Faridi, Amna Khurshid, Mehmood Khan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Young age breast cancers are quite prevalent in our setup, a significant number of which exhibit triple negative phenotype. These cancers behave in an aggressive fashion and unresponsive to targeted adjuvant therapy. We aimed to evaluate clinical and histopathologic features of triple negative cancers in our population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24581278 PMCID: PMC3996046 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Figure 1Micrographs of carcinoma with medullary features. (a-c) Infiltrating carcinoma with circumscribed pushing borders, dense peripheral lymphoid infiltrate and syncytial growth pattern. (d) High Ki-67 index in tumor cells.
Clinicopathologic features of triple negative breast cancers
| | |
| Mean ± SD (years) | 48.4 ± 12.3 |
| | |
| < 30 years | 15 (7.3%) |
| 31-40 years | 47 (22.9%) |
| 41-50 years | 61 (29.8%) |
| 51-70 years | 70 (34.1%) |
| > 70 years | 12 (5.9%) |
| | |
| Mean ± SD (mm) | 38.2 ± 16.2 |
| | |
| ≤ 2.0 cm (pT1) | 14 (12.7%) |
| 2.0-5.0 cm (pT2) | 81 (73.6%) |
| > 5.0 cm (pT3) | 15 (13.6%) |
| Without surgery/trucut biopsy$ | 95 |
| | |
| Infiltrating ductal carcinoma (NOS) | 158 (77.1%) |
| Infiltrating lobular carcinoma | 05 (2.4%) |
| Metaplastic carcinoma | 22 (10.7%) |
| Invasive papillary carcinoma | 07 (3.4%) |
| Infiltrating carcinoma with medullary features | 12 (5.9%) |
| Missed ductal and lobular carcinoma | 01 (0.5%) |
| | |
| Grade I (well differentiated) | |
| Grade II (moderately differentiated) | |
| Grade III (poorly differentiated) | 10 (4.9%) |
| 65 (31.7%) | |
| 130 (63.4%) | |
| | |
| Present | |
| Not present | |
| Cannot be assessed$ | 30 (27.3%) |
| 80 (72.7%) | |
| 95 | |
| | |
| Geographic necrosis involving > 40% of tumor | |
| Necrosis involving < 40% of tumor | |
| Necrosis is absent | 34 (30.9%) |
| Cannot be completely assessed$ | 72 (65.5%) |
| 04 (3.6%) | |
| 95 | |
| | |
| Extensive lymphocytic infiltration | 21 (19.1%) |
| Mild to moderate lymphocytic infiltration | 89 (80.9%) |
| Cannot be completely assessed$ | 95 |
| | |
| Negative lymph nodes (N0) | 57 (51.8%) |
| 1-3 positive lymph nodes (N1) | 24 (21.8%) |
| 4-9 positive lymph nodes (N2) | 11 (10.0%) |
| ≥ 10 positive lymph nodes (N3) | 18 (16.4%) |
| Lymph nodes dissection not done | 95 |
| | |
| Present | |
| Not present | 15 (13.6%) |
| Lymph nodes dissection not done | 95 (86.4%) |
| 95 | |
| | |
| Mean ± SD (%) | 45.2 ± 25.2 |
| | |
| ≤ 15% (low) | |
| 16-30% (Intermediate) | |
| >30% (High) | 32 (15.6%) |
| 37 (18.0%) | |
| 136 (66.3%) | |
| | |
| Modified radical mastectomy | |
| Breast conservation surgery | |
| Surgery not done/trucut biopsy | 90 (43.9%) |
| 15 (7.3%) | |
| 95 (46.3%) | |
| | |
| Right | 94 (45.9%) |
| Left | 111 (54.1%) |
$Cases are of trucut biopsies without surgery.
Correlation of tumor size with lymph node status, Ki67 index and tumor grade
| 1. | | | | | |
| | Positive | 3 | 35 | 10 | 0.036 |
| | Negative | 12 | 45 | 5 | |
| 2. | | | | | |
| | Low | 4 | 14 | 8 | |
| | Intermediate | 3 | 18 | 49 | 0.876 |
| | High | 8 | 49 | 8 | |
| 3. | | | | | |
| | GII | 2 | 11 | 4 | 0.422 |
| GIII | 13 | 70 | 11 | ||
Correlation of Ki67 index with tumor size, lymph node status and tumor grade
| 1. | | | | | |
| | T1 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 0.876 |
| | T2 | 14 | 18 | 49 | |
| | T3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | |
| 2. | | | | | |
| | Positive | 8 | 14 | 26 | 0.245 |
| | Negative | 14 | 10 | 38 | |
| 3. | | | | | |
| | GI | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0.180 |
| | GII | 7 | 17 | 41 | |
| GIII | 22 | 19 | 89 | ||
Figure 2Micrographs of metaplastic carcinoma, matrix producing type. (a-b) Tumor cells producing abundant myxoid matrix. (c) Microphotograph showing high Ki-67 index.
Figure 3Micrographs showing metaplastic carcinoma. (a-b) Matrix producing type with area of necrosis.