Literature DB >> 24580002

Robotics and the spine: a review of current and ongoing applications.

Faris Shweikeh1, Jordan P Amadio, Monica Arnell, Zachary R Barnard, Terrence T Kim, J Patrick Johnson, Doniel Drazin.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Robotics in the operating room has shown great use and versatility in multiple surgical fields. Robot-assisted spine surgery has gained significant favor over its relatively short existence, due to its intuitive promise of higher surgical accuracy and better outcomes with fewer complications. Here, the authors analyze the existing literature on this growing technology in the era of minimally invasive spine surgery.
METHODS: In an attempt to provide the most recent, up-to-date review of the current literature on robotic spine surgery, a search of the existing literature was conducted to obtain all relevant studies on robotics as it relates to its application in spine surgery and other interventions.
RESULTS: In all, 45 articles were included in the analysis. The authors discuss the current status of this technology and its potential in multiple arenas of spinal interventions, mainly spine surgery and spine biomechanics testing.
CONCLUSIONS: There are numerous potential advantages and limitations to robotic spine surgery, as suggested in published case reports and in retrospective and prospective studies. Randomized controlled trials are few in number and show conflicting results regarding accuracy. The present limitations may be surmountable with future technological improvements, greater surgeon experience, reduced cost, improved operating room dynamics, and more training of surgical team members. Given the promise of robotics for improvements in spine surgery and spine biomechanics testing, more studies are needed to further explore the applicability of this technology in the spinal operating room. Due to the significant cost of the robotic equipment, studies are needed to substantiate that the increased equipment costs will result in significant benefits that will justify the expense.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24580002     DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.FOCUS13526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of thoracolumbar transpedicular and vertebral body percutaneous screw placement: coupling the Rosa® Spine robot with intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance--a cadaver study.

Authors:  M Lefranc; J Peltier
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-22

2.  A 6-DOF parallel bone-grinding robot for cervical disc replacement surgery.

Authors:  Heqiang Tian; Chenchen Wang; Xiaoqing Dang; Lining Sun
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use.

Authors:  John A Buza; Jeffrey L Gum; Christopher R Good; Ronald A Lehman; John Pollina; Richard V Chua; Avery L Buchholz
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-09-28

4.  Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy.

Authors:  Stanley Kisinde; Xiaobang Hu; Shea Hesselbacher; Alexander M Satin; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weishang Li; Gaoyu Li; Wenting Chen; Lin Cong
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 6.  Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends.

Authors:  Marissa D'Souza; Julian Gendreau; Austin Feng; Lily H Kim; Allen L Ho; Anand Veeravagu
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

Review 7.  Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Gayatri R Bankar; Ajay Keoliya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 8.  Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends.

Authors:  Sotiris Avgousti; Eftychios G Christoforou; Andreas S Panayides; Sotos Voskarides; Cyril Novales; Laurence Nouaille; Constantinos S Pattichis; Pierre Vieyres
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Robotic Spine Surgery and Augmented Reality Systems: A State of the Art.

Authors:  Gianluca Vadalà; Sergio De Salvatore; Luca Ambrosio; Fabrizio Russo; Rocco Papalia; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.