Literature DB >> 24579994

Genetically engineered crops: from idea to product.

Jose Rafael Prado1, Gerrit Segers, Toni Voelker, Dave Carson, Raymond Dobert, Jonathan Phillips, Kevin Cook, Camilo Cornejo, Josh Monken, Laura Grapes, Tracey Reynolds, Susan Martino-Catt.   

Abstract

Genetically engineered crops were first commercialized in 1994 and since then have been rapidly adopted, enabling growers to more effectively manage pests and increase crop productivity while ensuring food, feed, and environmental safety. The development of these crops is complex and based on rigorous science that must be well coordinated to create a plant with desired beneficial phenotypes. This article describes the general process by which a genetically engineered crop is developed from an initial concept to a commercialized product.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24579994     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol        ISSN: 1543-5008            Impact factor:   26.379


  28 in total

1.  Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Plant characterization of Roundup Ready 2 Yield ® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael J Horak; Eric W Rosenbaum; Daniel L Kendrick; Bernard Sammons; Samuel L Phillips; Thomas E Nickson; Raymond C Dobert; Tim Perez
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Ending event-based regulation of GMO crops.

Authors:  Steven H Strauss; Joanna K Sax
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Growth dynamics of the Arabidopsis fruit is mediated by cell expansion.

Authors:  Juan-José Ripoll; Mingyuan Zhu; Stephanie Brocke; Cindy T Hon; Martin F Yanofsky; Arezki Boudaoud; Adrienne H K Roeder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Variability of CP4 EPSPS expression in genetically engineered soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill).

Authors:  Parimala Chinnadurai; Duška Stojšin; Kang Liu; Gregory E Frierdich; Kevin C Glenn; Tao Geng; Adam Schapaugh; Keguo Huang; Andrew E Deffenbaugh; Zi L Liu; Luis A Burzio
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Bidirectional but asymmetrical sexual hybridization between Brassica carinata and Sinapis arvensis (Brassicaceae).

Authors:  Kyle W Cheung; Fakhria M Razeq; Connie A Sauder; Tracey James; Sara L Martin
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  Maize hybrids derived from GM positive and negative segregant inbreds are compositionally equivalent: any observed differences are associated with conventional backcrossing practices.

Authors:  Tyamagondlu V Venkatesh; Erin Bell; Anna Bickel; Kevin Cook; Benjamin Alsop; Martijn van de Mortel; Ping Feng; Alan Willse; Tim Perez; George G Harrigan
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 8.  Hotter, drier, CRISPR: the latest edit on climate change.

Authors:  Karen Massel; Yasmine Lam; Albert C S Wong; Lee T Hickey; Andrew K Borrell; Ian D Godwin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 9.  Advances in Cereal Crop Genomics for Resilience under Climate Change.

Authors:  Tinashe Zenda; Songtao Liu; Anyi Dong; Huijun Duan
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29

10.  Continuous evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins overcomes insect resistance.

Authors:  Ahmed H Badran; Victor M Guzov; Qing Huai; Melissa M Kemp; Prashanth Vishwanath; Wendy Kain; Autumn M Nance; Artem Evdokimov; Farhad Moshiri; Keith H Turner; Ping Wang; Thomas Malvar; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.