| Literature DB >> 24578886 |
Magdalena Traczyk1, Edyta Borkowska1, Adam Jędrzejczyk2, Michał Pietrusiński1, Marek Rożniecki3, Piotr Marks2, Bogdan Kałużewski1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is frequently observed in urinary bladder neoplasms. In the reported study, an attempt was undertaken to determine the loss of heterozygosity of TP53(17p13), RB1(13q14), CDKN2A/ ARF(9p21) genes in DNA from neoplastic tissue, collected from patients with diagnosed urinary bladder carcinoma, and to compare the results with those of LOH evaluation in DNA isolated from urine sediment cells.Entities:
Keywords: CDKN2A/ARF; LOH; RB1; TP53; bladder cancer; loss of heterozygosity
Year: 2011 PMID: 24578886 PMCID: PMC3921734 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2011.03.art16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent European J Urol ISSN: 2080-4806
Histopathological characteristics and clinical data of 125 bladder cancer patients
| Histopathological data: | |
|---|---|
| Stage: | |
| Ta | 77 (61.6%) |
| >Ta | 48 (38.4%) |
| Grade: | |
| LG | 72 (57.6%) |
| HG | 53 (42.4%) |
| Clinical data: | |
| Primary tumors | 98 (78.4%) |
| Recurrent disease | 27 (21.6%) |
Characteristics of microsatellite markers and PCR conditions
| Marker name | Locus | Sequence of 5' >3' starters | Size (bp) | GDB and/or references | Annealing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D13S139 | 13q13.3-q13.3 | Forward: GAG GTC TCT AGC AAT AGG TAA AGG G | 127 | GDB: 190630, D13S139 | 58°C |
| D9S171 | 9p21 | Forward: AGC TAA GTG AAC CTC ATC TCT GTC T | 157 | GDB: 188218, AFM186xc3 [ | 58°C |
| D9S974 | 9p21-p21 | Forward: GAG CCT GGT CTG GAT CAT AA | 190 | GDB: 434853, D9S974 [ | 58°C |
| D9S1748 | 9p21.3-p21.3 | Forward: CAC CTC AGA AGT CAG TGA GT | 130 | GDB: 595589, D9S1748 [ | 63°C |
| Intron 1 P53 | 17p13.1 | Forward: ACT CCA GCC TGG GCA ATA AGA | 131 | Fridrich et al. [ | 64°C |
Fig. 1An electrophoretic image of exemplary results of LOH for one (Intron 1 P53), out of the five studied microsatellite markers. Legend: P1, P2, P3 – numbers of patients; b – DNA isolated from peripheral blood; t – DNA isolated from neoplastic tissue; LOH – loss of heterozygosity (informative result); I – informative result; N – non-informative result.
Fig. 2A. Comparison of LOH prevalence, regarding the particular studied genes in Ta tumours with LOH prevalence in clinically more advanced tumours (>Ta). B. Comparison of LOH frequency for the particular studied genes in LG tumours with the frequency of heterozygosity loss in HG tumors. C. Comparison of LOH frequency for the particular studied microsatellite markers in DNA of neoplastic cells and of urine sediment cells.
Comparison of data regarding the sensitivity of LOH analysis on DNA isolated from urine sediment, and presented by various authors
| Author | Test sensitivity | The number of microsatellite markers used for LOH analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Mao et al. (1996) [ | 95% | 13 markers |
| Sourvinos et al. (2001) [ | 93% | 15 markers |
| Dal Canto et al. (2003) [ | 82% | 13 markers |
| Shigyo et al. (1998) [ | 70% | 5 markers |
| Littel et al. (2005) [ | 49% | 7 markers |
| Turyn et al. (2006) [ | 39% | 12 markers |
| Utting et al. (2002) [ | 27% | 6 markers |