Literature DB >> 8571131

Molecular detection of primary bladder cancer by microsatellite analysis.

L Mao1, M P Schoenberg, M Scicchitano, Y S Erozan, A Merlo, D Schwab, D Sidransky.   

Abstract

Microsatellite DNA markers have been widely used as a tool for the detection of loss of heterozygosity and genomic instability in primary tumors. In a blinded study, urine samples from 25 patients with suspicious bladder lesions that had been identified cystoscopically were analyzed by this molecular method and by conventional cytology. Microsatellite changes matching those in the tumor were detected in the urine sediment of 19 of the 20 patients (95 percent) who were diagnosed with bladder cancer, whereas urine cytology detected cancer cells in 9 of 18 (50 percent) of the samples. These results suggest that microsatellite analysis, which in principle can be performed at about one-third the cost of cytology, may be a useful addition to current screening methods for detecting bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8571131     DOI: 10.1126/science.271.5249.659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  42 in total

1.  Analysis of the frequency of microsatellite instability and p53 gene mutation in splenic marginal zone and MALT lymphomas.

Authors:  M Sol Mateo; M Mollejo; R Villuendas; P Algara; M Sánchez-Beato; B Martinez-Delgado; P Martínez; M A Piris
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1998-10

2.  Loss of heterozygosity studies revisited: prior quantification of the amplifiable DNA content of archival samples improves efficiency and reliability.

Authors:  Kathryn Farrand; Lydija Jovanovic; Brett Delahunt; Bryan McIver; Ian D Hay; Norman L Eberhardt; Stefan K G Grebe
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  [Noninvasive and invasive bladder cancer: diagnostics and treatment].

Authors:  P J Goebell; F Vom Dorp; C Rödel; D Frohneberg; J W Thüroff; D Jocham; C Stief; S Roth; R Knüchel; K W Schmidt; I Kausch; D Zaak; C Wiesner; K Miller; R Sauer; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Molecular assessment of cancer.

Authors:  C Caldas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-02

Review 6.  The mutation rate and cancer.

Authors:  A L Jackson; L A Loeb
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Germline prognostic markers for urinary bladder cancer: obstacles and opportunities.

Authors:  David W Chang; Jian Gu; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Bladder tumor markers: need, nature and application. 1. Nucleus-based markers.

Authors:  M M Kirollos; S McDermott; R A Bradbrook
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

Review 9.  Relationship between schistosomiasis and bladder cancer.

Authors:  M H Mostafa; S A Sheweita; P J O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  The utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of bladder urothelial carcinoma in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Kyung Won Kwak; Sun Hee Kim; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.