B J Kerklaan1, B N M van Berckel2, K Herholz3, A Dols4, W M van der Flier5, P Scheltens5, Y A L Pijnenburg5. 1. Alzheimer Center VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Neurology, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Neurology, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands bj.kerklaan@slaz.nl. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Wolfson Molecular Imaging Center, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. 4. GGZ in Geest/Alzheimer Center VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Alzheimer Center VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Characteristic frontotemporal abnormalities on structural or functional neuroimaging are mandatory for a diagnosis of probable behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) according to the new criteria. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) imaging is commonly reserved for patients with suspected bvFTD without characteristic structural neuroimaging results. We studied the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET in these patients. METHODS: The 18F-FDG-PET was performed in 52 patients with suspected bvFTD but lacking characteristic structural neuroimaging results. The clinical diagnosis of bvFTD in the presence of functional decline (bvFTD/fd+) after a follow-up period of 2 years was used as a golden standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET for bvFTD/fd+ was 47% at a specificity of 92%. The differential diagnosis comprised alternative neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders and a benign phenocopy of bvFTD. CONCLUSIONS: The 18F-FDG-PET is able to identify nearly half of the patients with bvFTD who remain undetected by magnetic resonance imaging. In our selected group, high specificity enables exclusion of psychiatric and other neurodegenerative disorders.
UNLABELLED: Characteristic frontotemporal abnormalities on structural or functional neuroimaging are mandatory for a diagnosis of probable behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) according to the new criteria. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) imaging is commonly reserved for patients with suspected bvFTD without characteristic structural neuroimaging results. We studied the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET in these patients. METHODS: The 18F-FDG-PET was performed in 52 patients with suspected bvFTD but lacking characteristic structural neuroimaging results. The clinical diagnosis of bvFTD in the presence of functional decline (bvFTD/fd+) after a follow-up period of 2 years was used as a golden standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of 18F-FDG-PET for bvFTD/fd+ was 47% at a specificity of 92%. The differential diagnosis comprised alternative neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders and a benign phenocopy of bvFTD. CONCLUSIONS: The 18F-FDG-PET is able to identify nearly half of the patients with bvFTD who remain undetected by magnetic resonance imaging. In our selected group, high specificity enables exclusion of psychiatric and other neurodegenerative disorders.
Authors: Nathalie Van Den Berge; Vincent Keereman; Christian Vanhove; Bregt Van Nieuwenhuyse; Pieter van Mierlo; Robrecht Raedt; Kristl Vonck; Paul Boon; Roel Van Holen Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Mario F Mendez; Sylvia S Fong; Mark M Ashla; Elvira E Jimenez; Andrew R Carr Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: María C Rodriguez-Oroz; Belen Gago; Pedro Clavero; Manuel Delgado-Alvarado; David Garcia-Garcia; Haritz Jimenez-Urbieta Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: Simon Ducharme; Annemiek Dols; Robert Laforce; Emma Devenney; Fiona Kumfor; Jan van den Stock; Caroline Dallaire-Théroux; Harro Seelaar; Flora Gossink; Everard Vijverberg; Edward Huey; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Mario Masellis; Calvin Trieu; Chiadi Onyike; Paulo Caramelli; Leonardo Cruz de Souza; Alexander Santillo; Maria Landqvist Waldö; Ramon Landin-Romero; Olivier Piguet; Wendy Kelso; Dhamidhu Eratne; Dennis Velakoulis; Manabu Ikeda; David Perry; Peter Pressman; Bradley Boeve; Rik Vandenberghe; Mario Mendez; Carole Azuar; Richard Levy; Isabelle Le Ber; Sandra Baez; Alan Lerner; Ratnavalli Ellajosyula; Florence Pasquier; Daniela Galimberti; Elio Scarpini; John van Swieten; Michael Hornberger; Howard Rosen; John Hodges; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Yolande Pijnenburg Journal: Brain Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Rebecca M E Steketee; Rozanna Meijboom; Esther E Bron; Robert Jan Osse; Inge de Koning; Lize C Jiskoot; Stefan Klein; Frank Jan de Jong; Aad van der Lugt; John C van Swieten; Marion Smits Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-04-10 Impact factor: 4.881