Literature DB >> 24575778

Issues and pitfalls in method comparison studies.

Sonja Hartnack1.   

Abstract

Method comparison studies are needed for validation of new methods of measurements, for example, non-invasive blood pressure measurements against standard reference methods. After a brief introduction into method comparison studies, this paper is organized in three sections. The first section deals with the widely, though not always appropriately, used classical Bland-Altman plot with the limits of agreement and its extensions with non-constant bias and multiple observations. The second section comments on other statistical approaches including correlation coefficients, linear regressions and sensitivities and specificities which are sometimes seen in method comparison studies. The third section proposes the usage of linear mixed effects models as a flexible way to deal with questions associated with method comparison studies.
© 2014 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia.

Keywords:  Bland-Altman plot; agreement between two measurements; measure agreement with repeated measures; method comparison study

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24575778     DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg        ISSN: 1467-2987            Impact factor:   1.648


  2 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive blood pressure measurement in animals: Part 1 - Techniques for measurement and validation of non-invasive devices.

Authors:  Alicia Skelding; Alexander Valverde
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Basics of monitoring equipment.

Authors:  Tanya Duke-Novakovski
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.008

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.