| Literature DB >> 24574831 |
Jung Hee Kim1, Hyun Wook Baik1, Yeong Sook Yoon2, Hyo Jee Joung3, Ju Sang Park1, Sang Jong Park1, Eun Jeong Jang1, Sang Woon Park1, Sang Jung Kim1, Mi Jeoung Kim1, Dong Ok Jeon1, Hyo Jin Cho1, Sang Jin Lee1, Sung Gyu Im1, Sun Kyung Jang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oxidative stress increases the risk of cardiovascular complications of metabolic syndrome (MetS). This study was conducted to examine the difference in antioxidant capacity according to the presence of MetS, and to characterize the association between antioxidant capacity and MetS-related factors.Entities:
Keywords: Adiponectin; Insulin; Metabolic syndrome; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24574831 PMCID: PMC3932393 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.1.31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Intern Med ISSN: 1226-3303 Impact factor: 2.884
General and biochemical characteristics of study subjects according to metabolic syndro
Values are presented as mean ± standard error. The t test or chi-square test was used to compare groups.
MetS, metabolic syndrome; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.
Figure 1Antioxidant capacity in metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components. Reduced antioxidant capacity is defined as mean biological antioxidant potential (BAP) < 2,000 µmol/L. The BAP levels were significantly lower than reference value in low high density lipoprotein (HDL), high triglyceride (TG), and presence of MetS groups. Abdominal obesity, waist circumference of ≥ 90 cm in men or ≥ 85 cm in women; high blood pressure (BP), systolic blood pressure of ≥ 130 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure of ≥ 85 mmHg; low HDL, serum HDL cholesterol concentration of < 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/dL in women; high fasting blood glucose (FBG), serum glucose concentration of ≥ 100 mg/dL; high TG, serum TG concentration of ≥ 150 mg/dL. BAP level is shown as the geometric mean. The t test or chi-square test was used to compare the groups.
ap < 0.05, bp < 0.001.
Figure 2Comparison of insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), adiponectin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels according to antioxidant capacity. (A, B, D-F) The insulin, HOMA-IR, IL-6, TNF-α, and hs-CRP levels were higher and (C) adiponectin level was lower in the reduced antioxidant capacity group than those in the normal antioxidant capacity group. This graph compares the mean ± standard error of each factor between the two groups.
ap < 0.05.
Linear regression analysis of the association between reduced antioxidant capacity and adiponectin, insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
aAdjusted for age and sex.
Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for metabolic syndrome with biological antioxidant potential, adiponectin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Odds ratio was derived from logistic regression analysis including the variables listed in the table.
MetS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratio; CI, conf idence interval; BAP, biological antioxidant potential; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
aAdjusted for age and sex.