Literature DB >> 24572704

Risk stratification by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring across JNC classes of conventional blood pressure.

Jana Brguljan-Hitij1, Lutgarde Thijs2, Yan Li3, Tine W Hansen4, Jose Boggia5, Yan-Ping Liu2, Kei Asayama6, Fang-Fei Wei7, Kristina Bjorklund-Bodegard8, Yu-Mei Gu2, Takayoshi Ohkubo9, Jorgen Jeppesen10, Christian Torp-Pedersen11, Eamon Dolan12, Tatiana Kuznetsova2, Stolarz-Skrzypek Katarzyna13, Valerie Tikhonoff14, Sofia Malyutina15, Edoardo Casiglia14, Yuri Nikitin15, Lars Lind16, Edgardo Sandoya17, Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz13, Jan Filipovsky18, Yutaka Imai19, Jiguang Wang20, Eoin O'Brien21, Jan A Staessen22.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines propose classification of conventional blood pressure (CBP) into normotension (<120/<80 mm Hg), prehypertension (120-139/80-89 mm Hg), and hypertension (≥140/≥90 mm Hg).
METHODS: To assess the potential differential contribution of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) in predicting risk across CBP strata, we analyzed outcomes in 7,826 untreated people recruited from 11 populations.
RESULTS: During an 11.3-year period, 809 participants died (276 cardiovascular deaths) and 639, 383, and 225 experienced a cardiovascular, cardiac, or cerebrovascular event. Compared with normotension (n = 2,639), prehypertension (n = 3,076) carried higher risk (P ≤ 0.015) of cardiovascular (+41%) and cerebrovascular (+92%) endpoints; compared with hypertension (n = 2,111) prehypertension entailed lower risk (P ≤ 0.005) of total mortality (-14%) and cardiovascular mortality (-29%) and of cardiovascular (-34%), cardiac (-33%), or cerebrovascular (-47%) events. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke associated with 24-hour and daytime diastolic ABP (+5 mm Hg) were higher (P ≤ 0.045) in normotension than in prehypertension and hypertension (1.98 vs.1.19 vs.1.28 and 1.73 vs.1.09 vs. 1.24, respectively) with similar trends (0.03 ≤ P ≤ 0.11) for systolic ABP (+10 mm Hg). However, HRs for fatal endpoints and cardiac events associated with ABP did not differ significantly (P ≥ 0.13) across CBP categories. Of normotensive and prehypertensive participants, 7.5% and 29.3% had masked hypertension (daytime ABP ≥135/≥85 mm Hg). Compared with true normotension (P ≤ 0.01), HRs for stroke were 3.02 in normotension and 2.97 in prehypertension associated with masked hypertension with no difference between the latter two conditions (P = 0.93).
CONCLUSION: ABP refines risk stratification in normotension and prehypertension mainly by enabling the diagnosis of masked hypertension. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure; hypertension; masked hypertension; population science; prehypertension; risk stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24572704     DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpu002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  15 in total

1.  Prehypertension or masked hypertension-which is responsible for target-organ damage?

Authors:  Ying Chen; Yu-li Huang; Wei-yi Mai
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Masked Hypertension: Whom and How to Screen?

Authors:  D Edmund Anstey; Nathalie Moise; Ian Kronish; Marwah Abdalla
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Renal nerve ablation after SYMPLICITY HTN-3: confused at the higher level?

Authors:  Thomas F Lüscher; Felix Mahfoud
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Levels of office blood pressure and their operating characteristics for detecting masked hypertension based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Feng-Chang Lin; Laura A Tuttle; Daichi Shimbo; Keith M Diaz; Emily Olsson; Kristin Stankevitz; Alan L Hinderliter
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Commentary: Hypertension Phenotypes: The Many Faces of a Silent Killer.

Authors:  George A Mensah
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 6.  Out-of-office blood pressure improves risk stratification in normotension and prehypertension people.

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Jana Brguljan-Hitij; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes and the risk for hypertension.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Expert panel consensus recommendations for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Asia: The HOPE Asia Network.

Authors:  Kazuomi Kario; Jinho Shin; Chen-Huan Chen; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Yook-Chin Chia; Romeo Divinagracia; Jennifer Nailes; Satoshi Hoshide; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo; Yuda Turana; Yuqing Zhang; Sungha Park; Huynh Van Minh; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Prevalence of white coat and masked hypertension in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean Jacques Noubiap; Jobert Richie Nansseu; Jan René Nkeck; Ulrich Flore Nyaga; Jean Joel Bigna
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Blood pressure targets for hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow; Tatyana A Shamliyan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.