Literature DB >> 24898379

Levels of office blood pressure and their operating characteristics for detecting masked hypertension based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Anthony J Viera1, Feng-Chang Lin2, Laura A Tuttle3, Daichi Shimbo4, Keith M Diaz4, Emily Olsson3, Kristin Stankevitz3, Alan L Hinderliter5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Masked hypertension (MH)--nonelevated office blood pressure (BP) with elevated out-of-office BP average--conveys cardiovascular risk similar to or approaching sustained hypertension, making its detection of potential clinical importance. However, it may not be feasible or cost-effective to perform ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) on all patients with a nonelevated office BP. There likely exists a level of office BP below which ABPM is not warranted because the probability of MH is low.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 294 adults aged ≥ 30 years not on BP-lowering medication with office BP <140/90 mm Hg, all of whom underwent 24-hour ABPM. We calculated sensitivity, false-positive rate, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for the range of office BP cutoffs from 110 to 138 mm Hg systolic and from 68 to 88 mm Hg diastolic for detecting MH.
RESULTS: The systolic BP cutoff with the highest +LR for detecting MH (1.8) was 120 mm Hg, and the diastolic cutoff with the highest +LR (2.4) was 82 mm Hg. However, the systolic level of 120 mm Hg had a false-positive rate of 42%, and the diastolic level of 82 mm Hg had a sensitivity of only 39%.
CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff of office BP with the best overall operating characteristics for diagnosing MH is approximately 120/82 mm Hg. However, this cutoff may have an unacceptably high false-positive rate. Clinical risk tools to identify patients with nonelevated office BP for whom ABPM should be considered will likely need to include factors in addition to office BP. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure; diagnosis; hypertension; masked hypertension; screening.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24898379      PMCID: PMC4288122          DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpu099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  21 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of blood pressure in the office: recognizing the problem and proposing the solution.

Authors:  Martin G Myers; Marshall Godwin; Martin Dawes; Alexander Kiss; Sheldon W Tobe; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance.

Authors:  Taryn Krause; Kate Lovibond; Mark Caulfield; Terry McCormack; Bryan Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-08-25

3.  Reproducibility of masked hypertension in adults with untreated borderline office blood pressure: comparison of ambulatory and home monitoring.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Alan L Hinderliter; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Jason Fine; Rosalie Dominik
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Masked hypertension and prehypertension: diagnostic overlap and interrelationships with left ventricular mass: the Masked Hypertension Study.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Jonathan D Newman; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Diurnal blood pressure pattern and development of prehypertension or hypertension in young adults: the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Sha Zhu; Alan L Hinderliter; Daichi Shimbo; Sharina D Person; David R Jacobs
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2011-01-26

6.  Alterations of cardiac structure in patients with isolated office, ambulatory, or home hypertension: Data from the general population (Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni [PAMELA] Study).

Authors:  R Sega; G Trocino; A Lanzarotti; S Carugo; G Cesana; R Schiavina; F Valagussa; M Bombelli; C Giannattasio; A Zanchetti; G Mancia
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Validation of the Oscar 2 oscillometric 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.

Authors:  James Goodwin; Mary Bilous; Susan Winship; Paul Finn; Stephen C Jones
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.444

8.  Prevalence, causes, and consequences of masked hypertension: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Alphons G H Kessels; Peter W de Leeuw
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Incidence of cardiovascular events in white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension versus true normotension: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert H Fagard; Véronique A Cornelissen
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Cost-effectiveness of options for the diagnosis of high blood pressure in primary care: a modelling study.

Authors:  Kate Lovibond; Sue Jowett; Pelham Barton; Mark Caulfield; Carl Heneghan; F D Richard Hobbs; James Hodgkinson; Jonathan Mant; Una Martin; Bryan Williams; David Wonderling; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cases of Clinical Uncertainty to Differentiate Appropriate Inaction From Therapeutic Inertia.

Authors:  Sonal J Patil; Nuha K Wareg; Kelvin L Hodges; Jamie B Smith; Mark S Kaiser; Michael L LeFevre
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Blood pressure-associated polymorphism controls ARHGAP42 expression via serum response factor DNA binding.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Kevin D Mangum; Rachel A Dee; George A Stouffer; Craig R Lee; Akinyemi Oni-Orisan; Cam Patterson; Jonathan C Schisler; Anthony J Viera; Joan M Taylor; Christopher P Mack
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  High Prevalence of Hypertension in a Danish Population Telemedical Home Measurement of Blood Pressure in Citizens Aged 55-64 Years in Holstebro County.

Authors:  Nikolai Hoffmann-Petersen; Torsten Lauritzen; Jesper Nørgaard Bech; Erling Bjerregaard Pedersen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 4.  An Update on Masked Hypertension.

Authors:  D Edmund Anstey; Daniel Pugliese; Marwah Abdalla; Natalie A Bello; Raymond Givens; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Metabolic syndrome and masked hypertension among African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Lisandro D Colantonio; D Edmund Anstey; April P Carson; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Marwah Abdalla; Mario Sims; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Predictors of the Home-Clinic Blood Pressure Difference: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Ben Fletcher; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Nia Roberts; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Diagnostic performance of clinic and home blood pressure measurements compared with ambulatory blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Auttakiat Karnjanapiboonwong; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Usa Chaikledkaew; Charungthai Dejthevaporn; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Examination of Several Physiological and Psychosocial Factors Potentially Associated With Masked Hypertension Among Low-Risk Adults.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Feng-Chang Lin; Laura A Tuttle; Emily Olsson; Susan S Girdler; Alan L Hinderliter
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure in the Clinic (PROOF-BP): Derivation and Validation of a Tool to Improve the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Richard Stevens; Paramjit Gill; Una Martin; Marshall Godwin; Janet Hanley; Carl Heneghan; F D Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Brian McKinstry; Martin Myers; David Nunan; Alison Ward; Bryan Williams; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Prospective external validation of the Predicting Out-of-OFfice Blood Pressure (PROOF-BP) strategy for triaging ambulatory monitoring in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: observational cohort study.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Una Martin; Paramjit Gill; Richard Stevens; Fd Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Marshall Godwin; Janet Hanley; Brian McKinstry; Martin Myers; David Nunan; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.