Literature DB >> 24571521

Associations between pain drawing and psychological characteristics of different body region pains.

Kazuhiro Hayashi1, Young-Chang P Arai, Atsuko Morimoto, Shuichi Aono, Takahiko Yoshimoto, Makoto Nishihara, Tomoaki Osuga, Shinsuke Inoue, Takahiro Ushida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain drawings have frequently been used for documentation of pain and a convenient diagnosis tool. Pain drawings were found to be associated with psychological states in chronic patients with low back pain. Few researchers have investigated pain drawings except in low back pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the pain, pain drawings, psychological characteristics, and pain interference in the head, neck-shoulder (NS), and low-back/lower-limb (LB-LL) regions among patients with chronic pain.
METHODS: We included a total of 291 patients with new chronic pain (headache, 62; NS pain, 87; LB-LL pain, 142). The pain drawings and scores of 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS) were extracted from medical records. A subset of 60 pain drawings was scored by senior and junior evaluators to assess inter-rater agreement. We investigated the correlation between pain drawings and VAS, HADS, PCS, SF-MPQ, and PDAS in each body region group at the initial visit. Moreover, almost all patients received nonsurgical treatment as a follow-up and were investigated using VAS after treatment.
RESULTS: The reliability of pain drawings was substantial with an interevaluator reliability in headache, NS, and LB-LL pain. Nonorganic pain drawings were associated with psychological disturbances in NS and LB-LL pain, but not headache. Poor outcomes were associated with nonorganic drawings in LB-LL pain, but not in the case of headache or NS pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the characteristics of patients with nonorganic drawings differ according to body regions.
© 2014 World Institute of Pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back pain; headache; neck pain; nonorganic pain drawing; pain assessment; pain drawing; psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24571521     DOI: 10.1111/papr.12173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Pract        ISSN: 1530-7085            Impact factor:   3.183


  6 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of self-reported questionnaires to measure pain and disability in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: part 3-a systematic review from the CADRE Collaboration.

Authors:  N Lemeunier; S da Silva-Oolup; K Olesen; H Shearer; L J Carroll; O Brady; E Côté; P Stern; T Tuff; M Suri-Chilana; P Torres; J J Wong; D Sutton; K Murnaghan; P Côté
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anxiety and depression affect pain drawings in cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Anna MacDowall; Yohan Robinson; Martin Skeppholm; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.384

3.  Pain drawings predict outcome of surgical treatment for degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Anna MacDowall; Yohan Robinson; Martin Skeppholm; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.384

4.  Predictive factors for the outcome of multidisciplinary treatments in chronic low back pain at the first multidisciplinary pain center of Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hayashi; Young-Chang P Arai; Tatsunori Ikemoto; Makoto Nishihara; Shigeyuki Suzuki; Tomoe Hirakawa; Shingo Matsuo; Mami Kobayashi; Midori Haruta; Yuka Kawabata; Hiroki Togo; Taiji Noguchi; Toshiyuki Hase; Genki Hatano; Takahiro Ushida
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Do Gender-Specific and High-Resolution Three Dimensional Body Charts Facilitate the Communication of Pain for Women? A Quantitative and Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Line Lindhardt Egsgaard; Trine Søby Christensen; Ida Munk Petersen; Dorthe Scavenius Brønnum; Shellie Ann Boudreau
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2016-07-20

6.  Modifiable motion graphics for capturing sensations.

Authors:  Maria Galve Villa; Carsten D Mørch; Thorvaldur S Palsson; Shellie A Boudreau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.