Tiffany N Castillo1, Jeffrey Yao2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA USA ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway Street, Suite C442, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study analyzes both the subjective and objective symptom and functional outcomes of patients who underwent eithertraditional single-incision or two-incision carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS:From 2008 to 2009, patients with isolated carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized to undergo either single-incision or two-incision CTR by a single surgeon at a university medical center. Pre-operatively, participants completed a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, Brigham and Women's Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BWCTQ), as well as grip and pinch strength and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament sensation testing. At 2 weeks, 6 weeks and at least 6 months post-operatively, these measurements were repeated along with assessment of scar tenderness and pillar pain. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software to perform non-parametric tests and Pearson's correlations. Significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the single- and two-incision CTR groups with respect to pre- and post-operative DASH scores, BWCTQ scores, grip strength, pinch strength, scar tenderness, or pillar pain. The only statistically significant difference was improved sensation by Semmes-Weinstein in the single-incision group in the second finger at 6 weeks post-operatively and in the third finger at 6 months post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: The preservation of the superficial nerves and subcutaneous tissue between the thenar and hypothenar eminences may account for reports of less scar tenderness and pillar pain among recipients of two-incision CTR compared to single-incision CTR in the early post-operative period. However, there is similar post-operative recovery and improvement in grip and pinch strength and sensation after 6+ months post-operatively.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study analyzes both the subjective and objective symptom and functional outcomes of patients who underwent either traditional single-incision or two-incision carpal tunnel release (CTR). METHODS: From 2008 to 2009, patients with isolated carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized to undergo either single-incision or two-incision CTR by a single surgeon at a university medical center. Pre-operatively, participants completed a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, Brigham and Women's Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BWCTQ), as well as grip and pinch strength and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament sensation testing. At 2 weeks, 6 weeks and at least 6 months post-operatively, these measurements were repeated along with assessment of scar tenderness and pillar pain. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software to perform non-parametric tests and Pearson's correlations. Significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the single- and two-incision CTR groups with respect to pre- and post-operative DASH scores, BWCTQ scores, grip strength, pinch strength, scar tenderness, or pillar pain. The only statistically significant difference was improved sensation by Semmes-Weinstein in the single-incision group in the second finger at 6 weeks post-operatively and in the third finger at 6 months post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: The preservation of the superficial nerves and subcutaneous tissue between the thenar and hypothenar eminences may account for reports of less scar tenderness and pillar pain among recipients of two-incision CTR compared to single-incision CTR in the early post-operative period. However, there is similar post-operative recovery and improvement in grip and pinch strength and sensation after 6+ months post-operatively.
Authors: D W Levine; B P Simmons; M J Koris; L H Daltroy; G G Hohl; A H Fossel; J N Katz Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: M Rab; M Grünbeck; H Beck; W Haslik; K F Schrögendorfer; H-P Schiefer; M Mittlböck; M Frey Journal: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Michael Warren Keith; Victoria Masear; Peter C Amadio; Michael Andary; Richard W Barth; Brent Graham; Kevin Chung; Kent Maupin; William C Watters; Robert H Haralson; Charles M Turkelson; Janet L Wies; Richard McGowan Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Justin W Zumsteg; Matthew J C Crump; Gordon D Logan; Douglas R Weikert; Donald H Lee Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 2.230