Literature DB >> 15620502

Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release.

N Kharwadkar1, S Naique, P J A Molitor.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to compare the influence of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures on pillar pain, scar tenderness, extent of wound inflammation and overall outcome of the surgery following open carpal tunnel release. Forty hands in 33 patients (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-74 years) were randomized into group A (absorbable sutures) or group B (non-absorbable sutures). Clinical assessment was done at 2, 6 and 12 weeks follow-up. The outcome of surgery in terms of improvement of severity of symptoms and functional status of patients was assessed using a self-administered Boston Questionnaire. There was no significant difference between the two groups for any of our outcome measures at the final follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15620502     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Br        ISSN: 0266-7681


  10 in total

1.  Prospective randomized comparison of single-incision and two-incision carpal tunnel release outcomes.

Authors:  Tiffany N Castillo; Jeffrey Yao
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-03

2.  Endoscopic carpal tunnel release is preferred over mini-open despite similar outcome: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ho Jung Kang; Il Hyun Koh; Tae Jin Lee; Yun Rak Choi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Long-term outcomes following single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  K R Means; N H Dubin; K M Patel; J D Pletka
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-09

4.  Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.

Authors:  Saori Goto; Takashi Sakamoto; Riki Ganeko; Koya Hida; Toshi A Furukawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-09

Review 5.  A systematic review of outcomes assessed in randomized controlled trials of surgical interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference tool.

Authors:  Christina Jerosch-Herold; José C de Carvalho Leite; Fujian Song
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Comparing the running subcuticular technique versus the Donati technique in open carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit; Wachirakorn Aonsong; Porames Suwanno; Varah Yuenyongviwat
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Comparative study of surgical wound closure with nylon interrupted sutures and running subcuticular vicryl rapide suture after open release of the carpal tunnel.

Authors:  Vasileios Tzimas; Christos Kotsias; Charilaos Galanis; Georgios Panagiotakopoulos; Dimitrios Tsiampas; Juanita Parnis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Aliki Fiska
Journal:  Scars Burn Heal       Date:  2022-09-29

Review 8.  Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.

Authors:  Ryckie G Wade; Justin Cr Wormald; Andrea Figus
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01

9.  Clinical outcome and wound healing following carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two common suture materials.

Authors:  Robert J MacFarlane; Thomas D Donnelly; Yousaf Khan; Syam Morapudi; Mohammad Waseem; Jochen Fischer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Baseline performance of the ischaemic button model for induction of adhesions in laboratory rats.

Authors:  Elwin Hh Mommers; Liu Hong; Audrey Jongen; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.471

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.