Literature DB >> 24570614

Effects of cadence on aerobic capacity following a prolonged, varied intensity cycling trial.

Charles L Stebbins1, Jesse L Moore2, Gretchen A Casazza2.   

Abstract

We determined if high cadences, during a prolonged cycling protocol with varying intensities (similar to race situations) decrease performance compared to cycling at a lower, more energetically optimal, cadence. Eight healthy, competitive male road cyclists (35 ± 2 yr) cycled for 180 min at either 80 or 100 rpm (randomized) with varying intensities of power outputs corresponding to 50, 65 and 80% of VO2max. At the end of this cycling period, participants completed a ramped exercise test to exhaustion at their preferred cadence (90 ± 7 rpm). There were no cadence differences in blood glucose, respiratory exchange ratio or rate of perceived exertion. Heart Rate, VO2 and blood lactate were higher at 100 rpm vs. 80 rpm. The total energy cost while cycling during the 65% and 80% VO2max intervals at 100 rpm (15.2 ± 2.7 and 19.1 ± 2.5 kcal∙min(-1), respectively) were higher than at 80 rpm (14.3 ± 2.7 and 18.3± 2.2 kcal∙min(-1), respectively) (p < 0.05). Gross efficiency was higher at 80 rpm vs. 100 rpm during both the 65% (22.8 ± 1.0 vs. 21.3 ± 4.5%) and the 80% (23.1 vs. 22.1 ± 0.9%) exercise intensities (P< 0.05). Maximal power during the performance test (362 ± 38 watts) was greater at 80 rpm than 100 rpm (327 ± 27 watts) (p < 0.05). Findings suggest that in conditions simulating those seen during prolonged competitive cycling, higher cadences (i.e., 100 vs. 80 rpm) are less efficient, resulting in greater energy expenditure and reduced peak power output during maximal performance. Key PointsWhen competitive cyclists perform prolonged exercise that simulates racing conditions (i.e., variable, low-moderate submaximal cycling), a higher cadence results in excess energy expenditure and lower gross efficiency compared to a lower cadence at the same power output.Consequently, maximal power output is reduced during a subsequent exercise bout to exhaustion after using a higher cadence.Selection of a lower, more energetically optimal cadence during prolonged cycling exercise may allow competitive cyclists to enhance maximal performance later in a race.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Power output; cycling efficiency; energy expenditure; lactate; oxygen consumption; varied intensity

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570614      PMCID: PMC3918546     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  38 in total

1.  Changes in cycling efficiency and performance after endurance exercise.

Authors:  L Passfield; J H Doust
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Cadence, power, and muscle activation in cycle ergometry.

Authors:  B R MacIntosh; R R Neptune; J F Horton
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Effect of cadence, cycling experience, and aerobic power on delta efficiency during cycling.

Authors:  A P Marsh; P E Martin; K O Foley
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  In professional road cyclists, low pedaling cadences are less efficient.

Authors:  Alejandro Lucia; Alejandro F San Juan; Manuel Montilla; Silvia CaNete; Alfredo Santalla; Conrad Earnest; Margarita Pérez
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The effect of cadence on cycling efficiency and local tissue oxygenation.

Authors:  Robert D Jacobs; Kris E Berg; Dustin R Slivka; John M Noble
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 6.  Which factors determine the freely chosen cadence during submaximal cycling?

Authors:  Fabrice Vercruyssen; Jeanick Brisswalter
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.319

7.  The efficiency of pedaling and the muscular recruitment are improved with increase of the cadence in cyclists and non-cyclists.

Authors:  J L Dantas; B P C Smirmaul; L R Altimari; A H Okano; E B Fontes; T V Camata; A C Moraes
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

8.  Heart rate responses during a 4-d cycle stage race.

Authors:  G S Palmer; J A Hawley; S C Dennis; T D Noakes
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Linear increase in optimal pedal rate with increased power output in cycle ergometry.

Authors:  J R Coast; H G Welch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1985

10.  Muscle oxygen uptake and energy turnover during dynamic exercise at different contraction frequencies in humans.

Authors:  R A Ferguson; D Ball; P Krustrup; P Aagaard; M Kjaer; A J Sargeant; Y Hellsten; J Bangsbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  4 in total

1.  Determining optimal cadence for an individual road cyclist from field data.

Authors:  Robert Reed; Philip Scarf; Simon Adrian Jobson; Louis Passfield
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  Optimal and freely chosen paddling rate during moderate kayak ergometry.

Authors:  Søren Gam; Kent K Klitgaard; Anders B Funch; Markus E Sloth; Jesper W Holt; Jakob L Molbech; Ernst A Hansen
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.806

3.  Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing Enhances High Intensity Time Trial Performance Following Prolonged Cycling.

Authors:  Nicholas D Luden; Michael J Saunders; Andrew C D'Lugos; Mark W Pataky; Daniel A Baur; Caitlin B Vining; Adam B Schroer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Immersible ergocycle prescription as a function of relative exercise intensity.

Authors:  Mauricio Garzon; Mathieu Gayda; Anil Nigam; Alain-Steve Comtois; Martin Juneau
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.179

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.