Literature DB >> 19342296

Which factors determine the freely chosen cadence during submaximal cycling?

Fabrice Vercruyssen1, Jeanick Brisswalter.   

Abstract

The present review of cycling science focuses on the identification of criteria that affect the freely chosen cadence (FCC) during submaximal exercise of short and prolonged durations. Cadence selection during submaximal cycling constitutes a potential parameter affecting the endurance performance in subjects of varying aerobic fitness level and experience. The activity constraints such as specificity (e.g. cycle bout of triathlon) and exercise duration may play an important role in the selection of cadence and must be taken into consideration in the task description. The 'holistic' approach of this review is based on a multifactorial analysis considering the cycling constraints, and the physiological and biomechanical factors of cadence selection so as to establish any interrelationships between these factors. During cycle bouts of short duration (<15 min), it has been well argued that experienced cyclists, trained runners and triathletes adopt high cadences (80-100 rpm) systematically above the energetically optimal cadence (EOC) at which the oxygen uptake is minimal (55-65 rpm). The choice of a high cadence has been shown to be dependent upon several factors, such as the aerobic fitness level, the reduction in forces applied to the cranks, the lower extremity net joint moments and minimal neuromuscular fatigue. However, with increasing exercise duration the FCC has been reported to be close to the EOC exclusively in endurance athletes practising a variety of activities, suggesting an impact of training mode on the muscular adaptations and the organisation of the movement pattern. Copyright 2009 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19342296     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.12.631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  9 in total

1.  How do elite cross-country skiers adapt to different double poling frequencies at low to high speeds?

Authors:  Stefan Josef Lindinger; Hans-Christer Holmberg
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of low and high cadence interval training on power output in flat and uphill cycling time-trials.

Authors:  Alfred Nimmerichter; Roger Eston; Norbert Bachl; Craig Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Power-cadence relationship in endurance cycling.

Authors:  Umberto Emanuele; Jachen Denoth
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of cadence on aerobic capacity following a prolonged, varied intensity cycling trial.

Authors:  Charles L Stebbins; Jesse L Moore; Gretchen A Casazza
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Different cadences and resistances in sub-maximal synchronous handcycling in able-bodied men: Effects on efficiency and force application.

Authors:  Cassandra Kraaijenbrink; Riemer J K Vegter; Alexander H R Hensen; Heiko Wagner; Lucas H V van der Woude
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Skeletal muscle oxygenation during cycling at different power output and cadence.

Authors:  Lisha Shastri; Mariana Alkhalil; Claire Forbes; Tina El-Wadi; Gerrard Rafferty; Koji Ishida; Federico Formenti
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-02

7.  How to assess performance in cycling: the multivariate nature of influencing factors and related indicators.

Authors:  A Margherita Castronovo; Silvia Conforto; Maurizio Schmid; Daniele Bibbo; Tommaso D'Alessio
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Chronobiological Effects on Mountain Biking Performance.

Authors:  António Silveira; Francisco Alves; Ana M Teixeira; Luís Rama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Smart Electrically Assisted Bicycles as Health Monitoring Systems: A Review.

Authors:  Eli Gabriel Avina-Bravo; Johan Cassirame; Christophe Escriba; Pascal Acco; Jean-Yves Fourniols; Georges Soto-Romero
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.