Literature DB >> 24570350

An ideal-observer model of human sound localization.

J Reijniers1, D Vanderelst, C Jin, S Carlile, H Peremans.   

Abstract

In recent years, a great deal of research within the field of sound localization has been aimed at finding the acoustic cues that human listeners use to localize sounds and understanding the mechanisms by which they process these cues. In this paper, we propose a complementary approach by constructing an ideal-observer model, by which we mean a model that performs optimal information processing within a Bayesian context. The model considers all available spatial information contained within the acoustic signals encoded by each ear. Parameters for the optimal Bayesian model are determined based on psychoacoustic discrimination experiments on interaural time difference and sound intensity. Without regard as to how the human auditory system actually processes information, we examine the best possible localization performance that could be achieved based only on analysis of the input information, given the constraints of the normal auditory system. We show that the model performance is generally in good agreement with the actual human localization performance, as assessed in a meta-analysis of many localization experiments (Best et al. in Principles and applications of spatial hearing, pp 14-23. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2011). We believe this approach can shed new light on the optimality (or otherwise) of human sound localization, especially with regard to the level of uncertainty in the input information. Moreover, the proposed model allows one to study the relative importance of various (combinations of) acoustic cues for spatial localization and enables a prediction of which cues are most informative and therefore likely to be used by humans in various circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570350     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-014-0588-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  9 in total

1.  An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  Peter Claes; Jonas Reijniers; Mark D Shriver; Jonatan Snyders; Paul Suetens; Joachim Nielandt; Guy De Tré; Dirk Vandermeulen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Jose L Peña; Fanny Cazettes; Michael V Beckert; Brian J Fischer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A function for binaural integration in auditory grouping and segregation in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Kyle T Nakamoto; Trevor M Shackleton; David A Magezi; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The avian head induces cues for sound localization in elevation.

Authors:  Hans A Schnyder; Dieter Vanderelst; Sophia Bartenstein; Uwe Firzlaff; Harald Luksch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Multiple time scales of the ventriloquism aftereffect.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spectral Weighting Underlies Perceived Sound Elevation.

Authors:  Bahram Zonooz; Elahe Arani; Konrad P Körding; P A T Remco Aalbers; Tansu Celikel; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Re-weighting of Sound Localization Cues by Audiovisual Training.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Connor Campbell; Jan W H Schnupp; Andrew J King
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  A bio-mimetic miniature drone for real-time audio based short-range tracking.

Authors:  Roei Zigelman; Ofri Eitan; Omer Mazar; Anthony Weiss; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization.

Authors:  G Arditi; A J Weiss; Y Yovel
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.