Literature DB >> 24570341

Analyzing subvisible particles in protein drug products: a comparison of dynamic light scattering (DLS) and resonant mass measurement (RMM).

Jainik Panchal1, Joseph Kotarek, Ewa Marszal, Elizabeth M Topp.   

Abstract

Aggregation is common in protein drug manufacture, and while the effects of protein particulates are under investigation, many techniques applicable for their characterization have been recently developed. Among the methods available to characterize and quantify protein aggregates, none is applicable over the full size range and different methods often give conflicting results. The studies presented here compare two such methods: dynamic light scattering (DLS) and resonant mass measurement (RMM). The performance of each method was first characterized using polystyrene particle size standards (20, 60, 100, 200, 400, and 1,000 nm) over a range of concentrations. Standard particles were measured both singly and in binary mixtures containing 20 nm particles at a fixed concentration (10(14) particles/mL) and various concentrations of one of the other particle sizes (i.e., 60, 100, 200, 400, or 1,000 nm). DLS and RMM were then used to detect unknown aggregate content in stressed samples of IgG. Both instruments were shown to have a working range that depends on particle size and concentration. In binary mixtures and polydisperse solutions, DLS was able to resolve two species in a manner dependent on both concentration and particle size. RMM was able to resolve particles above 200 nm (150 nm for protein) at concentrations below 10(9) particles/mL. In addition, dilution was evaluated as a technique to confirm and quantify the number of particles in solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570341      PMCID: PMC4012052          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9579-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  17 in total

Review 1.  Analytical techniques for the evaluation of liquid protein therapeutics.

Authors:  Owen C Tatford; Peter T Gomme; Joseph Bertolini
Journal:  Biotechnol Appl Biochem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Meeting report on protein particles and immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: filling in the gaps in risk evaluation and mitigation.

Authors:  John Carpenter; Barry Cherney; Anthony Lubinecki; Stacey Ma; Ewa Marszal; Anthony Mire-Sluis; Thomas Nikolai; Jeanne Novak; Jack Ragheb; Jan Simak
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.856

Review 3.  Is any measurement method optimal for all aggregate sizes and types?

Authors:  John S Philo
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles in fluid.

Authors:  Thomas P Burg; Michel Godin; Scott M Knudsen; Wenjiang Shen; Greg Carlson; John S Foster; Ken Babcock; Scott R Manalis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Protein aggregation: pathways, induction factors and analysis.

Authors:  Hanns-Christian Mahler; Wolfgang Friess; Ulla Grauschopf; Sylvia Kiese
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Micro-flow imaging and resonant mass measurement (Archimedes)--complementary methods to quantitatively differentiate protein particles and silicone oil droplets.

Authors:  Daniel Weinbuch; Sarah Zölls; Michael Wiggenhorn; Wolfgang Friess; Gerhard Winter; Wim Jiskoot; Andrea Hawe
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Huntingtin aggregation monitored by dynamic light scattering.

Authors:  Y Georgalis; E B Starikov; B Hollenbach; R Lurz; E Scherzinger; W Saenger; H Lehrach; E E Wanker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Critical evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates.

Authors:  Vasco Filipe; Andrea Hawe; Wim Jiskoot
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Overlooking subvisible particles in therapeutic protein products: gaps that may compromise product quality.

Authors:  John F Carpenter; Theodore W Randolph; Wim Jiskoot; Daan J A Crommelin; C Russell Middaugh; Gerhard Winter; Ying-Xin Fan; Susan Kirshner; Daniela Verthelyi; Steven Kozlowski; Kathleen A Clouse; Patrick G Swann; Amy Rosenberg; Barry Cherney
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Comparison of scanning electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation for the sizing of poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles.

Authors:  Alexander Bootz; Vitali Vogel; Dieter Schubert; Jörg Kreuter
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.571

View more
  13 in total

1.  Holographic Characterization of Protein Aggregates.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xiao Zhong; David B Ruffner; Alexandra Stutt; Laura A Philips; Michael D Ward; David G Grier
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Bacterial Quorum Sensing Signals Self-Assemble in Aqueous Media to Form Micelles and Vesicles: An Integrated Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Study.

Authors:  Curran G Gahan; Samarthaben J Patel; Michelle E Boursier; Kayleigh E Nyffeler; James Jennings; Nicholas L Abbott; Helen E Blackwell; Reid C Van Lehn; David M Lynn
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Comparison of NMR and Dynamic Light Scattering for Measuring Diffusion Coefficients of Formulated Insulin: Implications for Particle Size Distribution Measurements in Drug Products.

Authors:  Sharadrao M Patil; David A Keire; Kang Chen
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Holographic characterization of colloidal fractal aggregates.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Fook Chiong Cheong; David B Ruffner; Xiao Zhong; Michael D Ward; David G Grier
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.679

5.  Non-invasive optical assessment of viscosity of middle ear effusions in otitis media.

Authors:  Guillermo L Monroy; Paritosh Pande; Ryan L Shelton; Ryan M Nolan; Darold R Spillman; Ryan G Porter; Michael A Novak; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.207

6.  Nanoformulation and Evaluation of Oral Berberine-Loaded Liposomes.

Authors:  Thuan Thi Duong; Antti Isomäki; Urve Paaver; Ivo Laidmäe; Arvo Tõnisoo; Tran Thi Hai Yen; Karin Kogermann; Ain Raal; Jyrki Heinämäki; Thi-Minh-Hue Pham
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Identification and Tetramer Structure of Hemin-Binding Protein SPD_0310 Linked to Iron Homeostasis and Virulence of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Kun Cao; Tianlong Zhang; Nan Li; Xiao-Yan Yang; Jianping Ding; Qing-Yu He; Xuesong Sun
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  Development of orthogonal NISTmAb size heterogeneity control methods.

Authors:  Abigail Turner; Katharina Yandrofski; Srivalli Telikepalli; Jason King; Alan Heckert; James Filliben; Dean Ripple; John E Schiel
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 9.  Polymers in the Delivery of siRNA for the Treatment of Virus Infections.

Authors:  Nicholas Reynolds; Megan Dearnley; Tracey M Hinton
Journal:  Top Curr Chem (Cham)       Date:  2017-03-21

10.  Dynamic Light Scattering of Biopharmaceutics-Can Analytical Performance Be Enhanced by Laser Power?

Authors:  Simone Aleandri; Andrea Vaccaro; Ricardo Armenta; Andreas Charles Völker; Martin Kuentz
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.