OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of chronic respiratory conditions in metropolitan fire-fighters and to study associations between occupational exposure, use of respiratory protection and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in fire-fighters with and without chronic respiratory conditions. METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort analysis: Respiratory symptoms, medical conditions, occupational tasks and exposures and consistency of using respiratory protection were inquired by questionnaire. The SF12(®)V2 Health Survey was used to measure physical (PCS-12) and mental (MCS-12) HRQoL. Fire-fighters were categorised in subgroups: asthma; COPD/emphysema/chronic bronchitis; no chronic respiratory conditions; and as being 'not involved' or 'involved' in fire-fighting tasks, the latter further categorised as 'consistent' or 'inconsistent' use of respiratory protection. PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores were compared between subgroups and categories using linear regression. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy fire-fighters were analysed, 24 (4%) fulfilled the criteria for asthma, 39 (7%) for COPD/emphysema/chronic bronchitis. Fire-fighters with asthma were older than those in the other two subgroups and had been employed in the fire service longer. Respiratory subgroups did not differ in their involvement in fire-fighting tasks. Ninety-one percent of fire-fighters reported relevant occupational exposure in the past year. Mean PCS-12 scores for fire-fighters with no chronic respiratory conditions, asthma and COPD/emphysema/bronchitis were 52.0 (SD 6.9), 47.0 (8.5) and 48.1 (9.4). For PCS-12 (but not for MCS-12), interaction between having a chronic respiratory condition and inconsistent use of respiratory protection during fire knockdown was observed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ten percent of metropolitan fire-fighters reported underlying chronic respiratory conditions. Presence of such a condition in combination with suboptimal protection from inhaled exposures may lead to poorer physical HRQoL.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of chronic respiratory conditions in metropolitan fire-fighters and to study associations between occupational exposure, use of respiratory protection and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in fire-fighters with and without chronic respiratory conditions. METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort analysis: Respiratory symptoms, medical conditions, occupational tasks and exposures and consistency of using respiratory protection were inquired by questionnaire. The SF12(®)V2 Health Survey was used to measure physical (PCS-12) and mental (MCS-12) HRQoL. Fire-fighters were categorised in subgroups: asthma; COPD/emphysema/chronic bronchitis; no chronic respiratory conditions; and as being 'not involved' or 'involved' in fire-fighting tasks, the latter further categorised as 'consistent' or 'inconsistent' use of respiratory protection. PCS-12 and MCS-12 scores were compared between subgroups and categories using linear regression. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy fire-fighters were analysed, 24 (4%) fulfilled the criteria for asthma, 39 (7%) for COPD/emphysema/chronic bronchitis. Fire-fighters with asthma were older than those in the other two subgroups and had been employed in the fire service longer. Respiratory subgroups did not differ in their involvement in fire-fighting tasks. Ninety-one percent of fire-fighters reported relevant occupational exposure in the past year. Mean PCS-12 scores for fire-fighters with no chronic respiratory conditions, asthma and COPD/emphysema/bronchitis were 52.0 (SD 6.9), 47.0 (8.5) and 48.1 (9.4). For PCS-12 (but not for MCS-12), interaction between having a chronic respiratory condition and inconsistent use of respiratory protection during fire knockdown was observed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ten percent of metropolitan fire-fighters reported underlying chronic respiratory conditions. Presence of such a condition in combination with suboptimal protection from inhaled exposures may lead to poorer physical HRQoL.
Authors: Frans E Greven; Esmeralda J Krop; Jack J Spithoven; Nena Burger; Jos M Rooyackers; Huib A Kerstjens; Sicco van der Heide; Dick J Heederik Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: A C Huizink; P Slottje; A B Witteveen; J A Bijlsma; J W R Twisk; N Smidt; I Bramsen; W van Mechelen; H M van der Ploeg; L M Bouter; T Smid Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Frans Greven; Esmeralda Krop; Jack Spithoven; Jos Rooyackers; Huib Kerstjens; Dick Heederik Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Mayris P Webber; Michelle S Glaser; Jessica Weakley; Jackie Soo; Fen Ye; Rachel Zeig-Owens; Michael D Weiden; Anna Nolan; Thomas K Aldrich; Kerry Kelly; David Prezant Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: David Miedinger; Prashant N Chhajed; Michael Tamm; Daiana Stolz; Christian Surber; Jörg D Leuppi Journal: Chest Date: 2007-03-30 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: J L Burgess; C J Nanson; D M Bolstad-Johnson; R Gerkin; T A Hysong; R C Lantz; D L Sherrill; C D Crutchfield; S F Quan; A M Bernard; M L Witten Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: T I J van den Berg; S M Alavinia; F J Bredt; D Lindeboom; L A M Elders; A Burdorf Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2008-01-03 Impact factor: 3.015