PURPOSE: Hypoxia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with poor prognosis and outcome. (18) F-Fluoroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA) is a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer developed to enable identification of hypoxic regions within tumor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of (18) F-FAZA-PET for assessment of hypoxia before and during radiation therapy. METHODS: Twelve patients with locally advanced HNSCC underwent (18) F-FAZA-PET scans before and at fraction 7 and 17 of concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. A hypoxic voxel was defined as a voxel expressing a standardized uptake value (SUV) equal or above the SUVmean of the posterior contralateral neck muscles plus three standard deviations. The fractional hypoxic volume fraction (FHV) and the spatial move of hypoxic volumes during treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: A hypoxic volume could be identified in ten patients before treatment. FAZA-PET FHV varied from 0 to 54.3% and from 0 to 41.4% in the primary tumor and in the involved node, respectively. Six out of these ten patients completed all the FAZA-PET-computed tomography (CT) during the radiotherapy. In all patients, FHV and SUVmax values decreased. All patient presented a spatial move of hypoxic volume, but only three patients had newborn hypoxic voxels after 17 fractions. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that (18) F-FAZA-PET could be used to identify and quantify tumor hypoxia before and during concomitant radio-chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced HNSCC. In addition to the information on prognostic value, the use of (18) F-FAZA-PET allowed the delineation of hypoxic volumes for dose escalation protocols. However, due to fluctuation of hypoxia during treatment, repeated scan will have to be performed (i.e. adaptive radiotherapy).
PURPOSE:Hypoxia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with poor prognosis and outcome. (18) F-Fluoroazomycin arabinoside (FAZA) is a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer developed to enable identification of hypoxic regions within tumor. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of (18) F-FAZA-PET for assessment of hypoxia before and during radiation therapy. METHODS: Twelve patients with locally advanced HNSCC underwent (18) F-FAZA-PET scans before and at fraction 7 and 17 of concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. A hypoxic voxel was defined as a voxel expressing a standardized uptake value (SUV) equal or above the SUVmean of the posterior contralateral neck muscles plus three standard deviations. The fractional hypoxic volume fraction (FHV) and the spatial move of hypoxic volumes during treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: A hypoxic volume could be identified in ten patients before treatment. FAZA-PET FHV varied from 0 to 54.3% and from 0 to 41.4% in the primary tumor and in the involved node, respectively. Six out of these ten patients completed all the FAZA-PET-computed tomography (CT) during the radiotherapy. In all patients, FHV and SUVmax values decreased. All patient presented a spatial move of hypoxic volume, but only three patients had newborn hypoxic voxels after 17 fractions. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that (18) F-FAZA-PET could be used to identify and quantify tumor hypoxia before and during concomitant radio-chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced HNSCC. In addition to the information on prognostic value, the use of (18) F-FAZA-PET allowed the delineation of hypoxic volumes for dose escalation protocols. However, due to fluctuation of hypoxia during treatment, repeated scan will have to be performed (i.e. adaptive radiotherapy).
Authors: Fréderic Duprez; Wilfried De Neve; Werner De Gersem; Marc Coghe; Indira Madani Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-07-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Morand Piert; Hans-Jürgen Machulla; Maria Picchio; Gerald Reischl; Sybille Ziegler; Piyush Kumar; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Roswitha Beck; Alexander J B McEwan; Leonard I Wiebe; Markus Schwaiger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bernd Gagel; Patrick Reinartz; Ercole Dimartino; Michael Zimny; Michael Pinkawa; Payam Maneschi; Sven Stanzel; Kurt Hamacher; Heinz H Coenen; Michael Westhofen; Ulrich Büll; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Pierre Mahy; Marc De Bast; Bernard Gallez; John Gueulette; Cameron J Koch; Pierre Scalliet; Vincent Grégoire Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Pierre Mahy; Marc De Bast; Tjibbe de Groot; Arnaud Cheguillaume; Jacques Gillart; Karin Haustermans; Daniel Labar; Vincent Grégoire Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2008-07-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Vlad C Sandulache; Yunyun Chen; Heath D Skinner; Tongtong Lu; Lei Feng; Laurence E Court; Jeffrey N Myers; Raymond E Meyn; Clifton D Fuller; James A Bankson; Stephen Y Lai Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Boris Epel; Matthew C Maggio; Eugene D Barth; Richard C Miller; Charles A Pelizzari; Martyna Krzykawska-Serda; Subramanian V Sundramoorthy; Bulent Aydogan; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Victor M Tormyshev; Howard J Halpern Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniela Thorwarth; Stefan Welz; David Mönnich; Christina Pfannenberg; Konstantin Nikolaou; Matthias Reimold; Christian La Fougère; Gerald Reischl; Paul-Stefan Mauz; Frank Paulsen; Markus Alber; Claus Belka; Daniel Zips Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 10.057