BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: [18F]-EF3 allows non-invasive detection of hypoxia. In the framework of its validation, we aimed at comparing its pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, metabolism and specificity for hypoxia with the hypoxia tracer [18F]-FMISO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: C3H mice were injected IV with 3.7-18.5 MBq of one of the two tracers. For pharmacokinetics experiments, blood, urines and feces were collected. For biodistribution experiments, 13 different organs were harvested. To assess the hypoxia-specificity of the tracers, intramuscular syngeneic FSA II tumor bearing mice breathing air or carbogen were used. Animals were sacrificed from 5 to 440 min after injection. Radioactivity was assessed ex-vivo in a gamma counter. Tracer metabolites were assessed with radio-HPLC of acetonitrile soluble fractions of tissues. RESULTS: Elimination half-life in blood (mono-exponential fit) reached 81.8 and 99.7 min for [18F]-EF3 and [18F]-MISO, respectively (NS). After 440 min, 71+/-7% (mean+/-SD) of injected activity of [18F]-EF3 was collected in the urine while 9+/-2% was collected in the feces, compared to 71+/-15% and 23+/-15% for [18F]-MISO (NS). Biodistribution was similar with a homogeneous distribution in most organs as early as 5 min after injection. With time, an increased activity in organs involved in excretion (kidney, bladder, liver and GI tract) was measured for both tracers; however, an increased background activity in "oxic" normal tissues (brain, lung, and esophagus) was also observed for [18F]-MISO. The percentage of metabolites was higher for [18F]-MISO compared to [18F]-EF3 in nearly all samples. Tumor-to-muscle ratios (TMRs) ranging from 2 to 4 were obtained under air-breathing condition for both tracers. CONCLUSION: Both tracers exhibited a similar pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in mice and accumulated in an hypoxia-dependent manner in tumors. However, more aspecific activity was observed with [18F]-MISO at late time points after tracer injection in normal tissues.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: [18F]-EF3 allows non-invasive detection of hypoxia. In the framework of its validation, we aimed at comparing its pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, metabolism and specificity for hypoxia with the hypoxia tracer [18F]-FMISO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: C3H mice were injected IV with 3.7-18.5 MBq of one of the two tracers. For pharmacokinetics experiments, blood, urines and feces were collected. For biodistribution experiments, 13 different organs were harvested. To assess the hypoxia-specificity of the tracers, intramuscular syngeneic FSA II tumor bearing mice breathing air or carbogen were used. Animals were sacrificed from 5 to 440 min after injection. Radioactivity was assessed ex-vivo in a gamma counter. Tracer metabolites were assessed with radio-HPLC of acetonitrile soluble fractions of tissues. RESULTS: Elimination half-life in blood (mono-exponential fit) reached 81.8 and 99.7 min for [18F]-EF3 and [18F]-MISO, respectively (NS). After 440 min, 71+/-7% (mean+/-SD) of injected activity of [18F]-EF3 was collected in the urine while 9+/-2% was collected in the feces, compared to 71+/-15% and 23+/-15% for [18F]-MISO (NS). Biodistribution was similar with a homogeneous distribution in most organs as early as 5 min after injection. With time, an increased activity in organs involved in excretion (kidney, bladder, liver and GI tract) was measured for both tracers; however, an increased background activity in "oxic" normal tissues (brain, lung, and esophagus) was also observed for [18F]-MISO. The percentage of metabolites was higher for [18F]-MISO compared to [18F]-EF3 in nearly all samples. Tumor-to-muscle ratios (TMRs) ranging from 2 to 4 were obtained under air-breathing condition for both tracers. CONCLUSION: Both tracers exhibited a similar pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in mice and accumulated in an hypoxia-dependent manner in tumors. However, more aspecific activity was observed with [18F]-MISO at late time points after tracer injection in normal tissues.
Authors: Ludwig J Dubois; Natasja G Lieuwes; Marco H M Janssen; Wenny J M Peeters; Albert D Windhorst; Joseph C Walsh; Hartmuth C Kolb; Michel C Ollers; Johan Bussink; Guus A M S van Dongen; Albert van der Kogel; Philippe Lambin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-08-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stéphanie Servagi-Vernat; Sarah Differding; Francois-Xavier Hanin; Daniel Labar; Anne Bol; John A Lee; Vincent Grégoire Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Aram S A van Brussel; Arthur Adams; Sabrina Oliveira; Bram Dorresteijn; Mohamed El Khattabi; Jeroen F Vermeulen; Elsken van der Wall; Willem P Th M Mali; Patrick W B Derksen; Paul J van Diest; Paul M P van Bergen En Henegouwen Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Sven De Bruycker; Christel Vangestel; Steven Staelens; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Sigrid Stroobants Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.161