Literature DB >> 15119636

Impact of fill volume on peritoneal clearances and cytokine appearance in peritoneal dialysis.

Ramón Paniagua1, María de Jesús Ventura, Ernesto Rodríguez, Juana Sil, Teresa Galindo, María Elena Hurtado, Guadalupe Alcántara, Amado Chimalpopoca, Isabel González, Abraham Sanjurjo, Lourdes Barrón, Dante Amato, Salim Mujais.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current adequacy guidelines for peritoneal dialysis encourage the use of large fill volumes for the attainment of small solute clearance targets. These guidelines have influenced clinical practice in a significant way, and adoption of higher fill volumes has become common in North America. Several studies, however, have challenged the relevance of increasing small solute clearance; this practice may result in untoward consequences in patients.
OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to explore the relationship between dialysate volume and the clearance of different sized molecules, fluid dynamics, and appearance of peritoneal cytokines.
METHODS: Thirteen adult prevalent patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis were studied. Three different dialysate volumes (2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L) were infused on consecutive days in a random order. Several measurements of peritoneal fluid dynamics (intraperitoneal pressure, net ultrafiltration, fluid absorption), solute clearances (urea, creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, albumin, IgG, and transferrin), and appearance of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) were assessed.
RESULTS: Increase in dialysate fill volume (from 2 to 2.5 to 3 L) was examined in relationship to body surface area (BSA). The dialysate volume/BSA (DV/BSA) ratio increased from 1262 to 1566 to 1871 mL/m2 on 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L dialysate volumes, respectively. In parallel, diastolic blood pressure increased from 82.7 +/- 8.8 to 87.0 +/- 9.5 to 92 +/- 8.3 mmHg (p < 0.05). Net ultrafiltration rate also increased, from 0.46 +/- 0.48 to 0.72 +/- 0.42 to 0.97 +/- 0.49 mL/minute (p < 0.01), despite a concomitant increase in fluid absorption, from 1.05 +/- 0.34 to 1.21 +/- 0.40 to 1.56 +/- 0.22 mL/min (p < 0.01). Urea peritoneal clearance increased from 8.27 +/- 0.68 to 9.92 +/- 1.6 to 12.98 +/- 4.03 mL/min (p < 0.01); creatinine peritoneal clearance increased from 6.69 +/- 1.01 to 7.64 +/- 1.12 to 8.69 +/- 1.76 mL/min (p < 0.01). Clearance of the other measured molecules did not change. Appearance of interleukin-6 increased 17% and 43% (p < 0.01), and TNFalpha appearance increased 14% and 50% (p < 0.01) when dialysate volumes of 2.5 and 3.0 L were used, compared with 2.0 L.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that, with higher values of DV/BSA ratio, small solute peritoneal clearance is increased, but clearances of large molecules remain unchanged. With the use of higher volumes, fluid absorption rate and the appearance of proinflammatory cytokines in the dialysate are increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15119636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

1.  Intraperitoneal IL-6 signaling in incident patients treated with icodextrin and glucose bicarbonate/lactate-based peritoneal dialysis solutions.

Authors:  Sylvie Opatrna; Daniel Lysak; Ladislav Trefil; Clare Parker; Nicholas Topley
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Intraperitoneal pressure has a prognostic impact on peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Outerelo; Rita Gouveia; Fernando Teixeira e Costa; Aura Ramos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  A load volume suitable for reaching dialysis adequacy targets in anuric patients on 4-exchange CAPD.

Authors:  Giovambattista Virga; Vincenzo La Milia; Roberto Russo; Luciana Bonfante; Gian Maria Iadarola; Stefano Maffei; Massimo Sandrini; Matthias Zeiler; Maurizio Nordio
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.902

4.  Sex Modulates Cardiovascular Effects of Icodextrin-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions.

Authors:  Ramón Paniagua; Elvia García-López; Marcela Ávila-Díaz; María-de-Jesús Ventura; Oscar Orihuela; María-Del-Carmen Prado-Uribe; Juan-Manuel Gallardo-Montoya; Bengt Lindholm
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Tumor necrosis factor α is a risk factor for infection in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Eunjung Kang; Seihran Kim; Hwa Jung Lee; Inhwee Park; Heungsoo Kim; Gyu-Tae Shin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  In Search of a Simple and Reliable Method of Measuring Intra-abdominal Pressure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Tharshika Thangarasa; Dana Foisy; Julie Leidecker; Daniel J Corsi; Hilary Meggison; Brian Blew; Jeffery Warren; Deborah Zimmerman
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2019-12-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.