Literature DB >> 24568749

Whats that noise? Bedside monitoring in the Emergency Department.

Rob B Way1, Sally A Beer2, Sarah J Wilson3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, duration and type of audible monitor alarms in an ED, utilising the standard manufacturer's classification.
METHODS: The audible monitor alarms and the timing of any intervention related to the patient monitoring was observed and recorded.
RESULTS: 110 Patients admitted to the Majors area or Resuscitation Room were observed for a total of 93 hours. One monitor was observed at a time. Alarm noise was generated 29% of the observation time. Overall, 429 alarms lasting 21 hours 27 minutes were judged to be positive and 143 alarms lasting 5 hours 47 minutes, negative. 74% of Resuscitation Room and 47% of Majors alarms were silenced or paused. Alarm limit parameters were only adjusted after 5% of alarms in Resuscitation Room and 6% of alarms in Majors.
CONCLUSIONS: Whilst high level monitoring is desired from a patient safety perspective, it contributes to a significant ambient noise level, which is recognised by all who pass through an ED, and can be detrimental to patients, relatives and staff. We have demonstrated that there is a high probability of near-continuous alarm noise from patient monitoring in a 10-bedded Majors area. We make suggestions for methods of noise reduction and intend to implement some of these within our own ED.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alarm fatigue; Alarm noise; Emergency; Monitor alarms; Patient deterioration; Patient monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24568749     DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Emerg Nurs        ISSN: 1878-013X            Impact factor:   2.142


  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of Physiologic Monitor Alarm Characteristics and Pragmatic Interventions to Reduce Alarm Frequency.

Authors:  Christine Weirich Paine; Veena V Goel; Elizabeth Ely; Christopher D Stave; Shannon Stemler; Miriam Zander; Christopher P Bonafide
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.960

2.  Comparison of staff and family perceptions of causes of noise pollution in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and suggested intervention strategies.

Authors:  Harsheen Kaur; Gina M Rohlik; Michael E Nemergut; Sandeep Tripathi
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  Understanding heart rate alarm adjustment in the intensive care units through an analytical approach.

Authors:  Richard L Fidler; Michele M Pelter; Barbara J Drew; Jorge Arroyo Palacios; Yong Bai; Daphne Stannard; J Matt Aldrich; Xiao Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Role of Large Clinical Datasets From Physiologic Monitors in Improving the Safety of Clinical Alarm Systems and Methodological Considerations: A Case From Philips Monitors.

Authors:  Azizeh Khaled Sowan; Charles Calhoun Reed; Nancy Staggers
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2016-09-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.