| Literature DB >> 24568567 |
Mona S Ellithey, Namrita Lall, Ahmed A Hussein, Debra Meyer1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer and HIV/AIDS are two of the greatest public health and humanitarian challenges facing the world today. Infection with HIV not only weakens the immune system leading to AIDS and increasing the risk of opportunistic infections, but also increases the risk of several types of cancer. The enormous biodiversity of marine habitats is mirrored by the molecular diversity of secondary metabolites found in marine animals, plants and microbes which is why this work was designed to assess the anti-HIV and cytotoxic activities of some marine organisms of the Red Sea.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24568567 PMCID: PMC3939812 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-77
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Cytotoxicity of different marine extracts. Samples were dissolved in DMSO and diluted with the medium to a final concentration of 100 μg/ml. Significant differences between the extracts and the DMSO control was calculated using IBM SPPS version 19. **P < 0.00, *P < 0.05 and N indicates not significant.
The half maximal inhibition concentration (IC ) of the lipophilic fraction of the marine organism extracts against HIV-1 PR is presented
| Mollusca | N/Ta | 76.53 | 110.80 | N/A | 1.4 | N/Tb | |
| Rhodophyta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/A | N/A | 2.6 | |
| Chlorophyta | 52.46 | 32.32 | 143.21 | 2.73 | 4.43 | N/Tb | |
| Phaeophyta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/A | N/A | N/Tb | |
| Tracheophyta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/A | N/A | N/Tb | |
| Porifera | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/A | N/A | N/Tb | |
| Porifera | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/A | N/A | N/Tb | |
| Cnidaria | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/Ta | N/A | N/A | 0.84 | |
| Cnidaria | 44.54 | n/a | 43.95 | 0.99 | n/a | 8.6 | |
| Cnidaria | 24.00 | 30.08 | 43.95 | 1.83 | 1.46 | 13.1 | |
| Cnidaria | 89.05 | 20.0 | 6.80 | 0.08 | 0.34 | N/Tb | |
| Cnidaria | 6.50 | 28.10 | 41.90 | 6.45 | 1.46 | 12.0 | |
| Cnidaria | N/Ta | 5.200 | 10.90 | N/A | 2.10 | N/Tb | |
| Actinomycin Dc | 7.8 | 17.7 | 11.8 | 1.5 | 0.7 | N/Tb | |
| Acetylpepstatind | 5.7 | ||||||
The IC50 values were determined in different cell lines and are presented along with the associated selectivity index (SI) values which represent the relative activity towards the cancer cell lines compared to the Vero cells.
Not tested (N/Ta) samples with inhibitory activities less than 50% at 100 μg/ml.
Not tested (N/Tb) samples with inhibitory activities less than 80% at 100 μg/ml.
Superscript C indicates the anticancer drug used as positive control for the cytotoxicity assay.
Superscript D indicates the positive control used in the PR inhibition assay.
Figure 2HIV-1 PR inhibition percentages of different marine extracts. Samples were dissolved in DMSO and diluted with the assay buffer to a final concentration of 100 μg/ml. Significant differences between the extracts and the DMSO control was calculated using IBM SPPS version 19. **P < 0.00, *P < 0.05 and N indicates not significant. AP indicates the experimental positive control acetyl pepstatin.