Literature DB >> 24568228

An evidence-based practice educational intervention for athletic trainers: a randomized controlled trial.

Cailee E Welch1, Bonnie L Van Lunen, Dorice A Hankemeier.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: As evidence-based practice (EBP) becomes a necessity in athletic training, Web-based modules have been developed and made available to the National Athletic Trainers' Association membership as a mechanism to educate athletic trainers (ATs) on concepts of EBP.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of an educational intervention on enhancing knowledge of EBP among ATs.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Web-based modules and knowledge assessment. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 164 of 473 ATs (34.7% response rate), including professional athletic training students, graduate students, clinical preceptors, educators, and clinicians, were randomized into a control group (40 men, 42 women) or experimental group (33 men, 49 women). INTERVENTION(S): Ten Web-based modules were developed that covered concepts involved in the EBP process. Both groups completed the Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge Assessment before and after the intervention phase. During the intervention phase, the experimental group had access to the Web-based modules for 4 weeks, whereas the control group had no direct responsibilities for the investigation. The knowledge assessment consisted of 60 multiple choice questions pertaining to concepts presented in the 10 modules. Test-retest reliability was determined to be good (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1] = 0.726, 95% confidence interval = 0.605, 0.814). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Independent variables consisted of group (control, experimental) and time (preassessment, postassessment). Knowledge scores were tabulated by awarding 1 point for each correct answer (maximum = 60). Between-group and within-group differences were calculated using a 2 × 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance (P ≤ .05), post hoc t tests, and Hedges g effect size with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: We found a group × time interaction (F₁,₁₆₂ = 26.29, P < .001). No differences were identified between the control (30.12 ± 5.73) and experimental (30.65 ± 5.93) groups during the preassessment (t₁₆₂ = 0.58, P = .84). The experimental group (36.35 ± 8.58) obtained higher scores on the postassessment than the control group (30.99 ± 6.33; t162 = 4.55, P = .01). No differences were identified among time instances within the control group (t₈₁ = 1.77, P = .08); however, the experimental group obtained higher scores on the postassessment than the preassessment (t₈₁ = 7.07, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: An educational intervention consisting of 10 Web-based modules was an effective mechanism to increase knowledge of foundational EBP concepts among ATs. However, it is not known whether ATs are integrating EBP into daily clinical practice. Researchers should determine whether increased knowledge of EBP affects the daily clinical decision making of ATs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24568228      PMCID: PMC3975777          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.2.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  17 in total

1.  Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

2.  Changing clinical practice.

Authors:  M Wilkes
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; L Shirran; R Thomas; G Mowatt; C Fraser; L Bero; R Grilli; E Harvey; A Oxman; M A O'Brien
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Changing physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work.

Authors:  Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles; Anne E Walker; Ruth E Thomas
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature.

Authors:  Heidi S Chumley-Jones; Alison Dobbie; Cynthia L Alford
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Do short courses in evidence based medicine improve knowledge and skills? Validation of Berlin questionnaire and before and after study of courses in evidence based medicine.

Authors:  L Fritsche; T Greenhalgh; Y Falck-Ytter; H-H Neumayer; R Kunz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

Review 7.  From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.

Authors:  Richard Grol; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Medical education as a science: the quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction.

Authors:  Gerard S Letterie
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  An evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in radiology.

Authors:  C G Jacoby; W L Smith; M A Albanese
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Do the methods used to analyse missing data really matter? An examination of data from an observational study of Intermediate Care patients.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Stirling Bryan; Lucinda Billingham
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-06-27
View more
  4 in total

1.  Future directions of evidence-based practice in athletic training: perceived strategies to enhance the use of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Cailee E Welch; Dorice A Hankemeier; Aimee L Wyant; Danica G Hays; William A Pitney; Bonnie L Van Lunen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Perceived outcomes of web-based modules designed to enhance athletic trainers' knowledge of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Cailee E Welch; Bonnie L Van Lunen; Dorice A Hankemeier; Aimee L Wyant; Jessica M Mutchler; William A Pitney; Danica G Hays
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Athletic Trainers' Beliefs About and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice.

Authors:  Kimberly Keeley; Stacy E Walker; Dorice A Hankemeier; Malissa Martin; Thomas A Cappaert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leila Cusack; Chris B Del Mar; Iain Chalmers; Elizabeth Gibson; Tammy C Hoffmann
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.