BACKGROUND: Fever in children is common and mostly caused by self-limiting infections. However, the number of (re)consultations in primary care is high, driven by lack of knowledge and fear among parents. These drivers have only been studied in parents when consulting with their sick child. AIM: To study knowledge, attitudes, and practice in childhood fever in parents within the general population. DESIGN AND SETTING: Internet-based survey of a sample of 1000 parents from the general population of the Netherlands. METHOD: A 26-item cross-sectional survey was conducted of parents with one or more children aged < 5 years. RESULTS: Of 625 responders (average age 34.9 years), 63.4% and 43.7% indicated ever visiting their GP or GP's out-of-hours centre with a febrile child, respectively: 88.3% knew the definition of fever (>38°C), 55.2% correctly stated that antibiotics are effective in treating bacterial infections and not viral infections, and 72.0% knew that not every child with a fever needs treatment with antibiotics or paracetamol. When asked to prioritise aspects of a GP's consultation, 53.6% considered physical examination as most important. Obtaining a prescription for antibiotics or antipyretics was considered least important. CONCLUSION: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning childhood fever varied among parents with young children. Parents generally expect thorough physical examination and information, but not a prescription for medication (antibiotics or antipyretics) when consulting with a feverish child. GPs must be aware of these expectations as these provide opportunities to enhance consultations in general and prescription strategies in particular.
BACKGROUND:Fever in children is common and mostly caused by self-limiting infections. However, the number of (re)consultations in primary care is high, driven by lack of knowledge and fear among parents. These drivers have only been studied in parents when consulting with their sick child. AIM: To study knowledge, attitudes, and practice in childhood fever in parents within the general population. DESIGN AND SETTING: Internet-based survey of a sample of 1000 parents from the general population of the Netherlands. METHOD: A 26-item cross-sectional survey was conducted of parents with one or more children aged < 5 years. RESULTS: Of 625 responders (average age 34.9 years), 63.4% and 43.7% indicated ever visiting their GP or GP's out-of-hours centre with a febrile child, respectively: 88.3% knew the definition of fever (>38°C), 55.2% correctly stated that antibiotics are effective in treating bacterial infections and not viral infections, and 72.0% knew that not every child with a fever needs treatment with antibiotics or paracetamol. When asked to prioritise aspects of a GP's consultation, 53.6% considered physical examination as most important. Obtaining a prescription for antibiotics or antipyretics was considered least important. CONCLUSION: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning childhood fever varied among parents with young children. Parents generally expect thorough physical examination and information, but not a prescription for medication (antibiotics or antipyretics) when consulting with a feverish child. GPs must be aware of these expectations as these provide opportunities to enhance consultations in general and prescription strategies in particular.
Entities:
Keywords:
antipyretics; child; fever; general practice; infection; parents
Authors: Lauren M S Cohee; Michael T Crocetti; Janet R Serwint; Bruce Sabath; Sumit Kapoor Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Y A Al-Eissa; A M Al-Sanie; S A Al-Alola; M A Al-Shaalan; S S Ghazal; A H Al-Harbi; A S Al-Wakeel Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2000 May-July Impact factor: 1.526
Authors: Gijs Elshout; Marijke Kool; Johannes C Van der Wouden; Henriëtte A Moll; Bart W Koes; Marjolein Y Berger Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Jochen W L Cals; Dennis Boumans; Robert J M Lardinois; Ralph Gonzales; Rogier M Hopstaken; Christopher C Butler; Geert-Jan Dinant Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Eefje G P M de Bont; Geert-Jan Dinant; Gijs Elshout; Gijs van Well; Nick A Francis; Bjorn Winkens; Jochen W L Cals Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Eefje G P M de Bont; Julie M M Lepot; Dagmar A S Hendrix; Nicole Loonen; Yvonne Guldemond-Hecker; Geert-Jan Dinant; Jochen W L Cals Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kirsten K B Peetoom; Luc J L Ploum; Jacqueline J M Smits; Nicky S J Halbach; Geert-Jan Dinant; Jochen W L Cals Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Eefje G P M de Bont; Nicole Loonen; Dagmar A S Hendrix; Julie M M Lepot; Geert-Jan Dinant; Jochen W L Cals Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Marcia Vervloet; Marianne A Meulepas; Jochen W L Cals; Mariëtta Eimers; Lucas S van der Hoek; Liset van Dijk Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Jacqueline P G Stakenborg; Eefje G P M de Bont; Kirsten K B Peetoom; Marjorie H J M G Nelissen-Vrancken; Jochen W L Cals Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2016-07-23