Literature DB >> 24567201

Trends and quality of care in outpatient visits to generalist and specialist physicians delivering primary care in the United States, 1997-2010.

Samuel T Edwards1, John N Mafi, Bruce E Landon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many specialists serve as primary care physicians (PCPs), the type of patients they serve, the range of services they provide, and the quality of care they deliver is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in patient, physician, and visit characteristics, and compare visit-based quality for visits to generalists and specialists self-identified as PCPs.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study and time trend analysis. DATA: Nationally representative sample of visits to office-based physicians from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1997-2010. MAIN MEASURES: Proportions of primary care visits to generalist and specialists, patient characteristics, principal diagnoses, and quality. KEY
RESULTS: Among 84,041 visits to self-identified PCPs representing an estimated 4.0 billion visits, 91.5 % were to generalists, 5.9 % were to medical specialists and 2.6 % were to obstetrician/gynecologists. The proportion of PCP visits to generalists increased from 88.4 % in 1997 to 92.4 % in 2010, but decreased for medical specialists from 8.0 % to 4.8 %, p = 0.04). The proportion of medical specialist visits in which the physician self-identified as the patient's PCP decreased from 30.6 % in 1997 to 9.8 % in 2010 (p < 0.01). Medical specialist PCPs take care of older patients (mean age 61 years), and dedicate most of their visits to chronic disease management (51.0 %), while generalist PCPs see younger patients (mean age 55.4 years) most commonly for new problems (40.5 %). Obstetrician/gynecologists self-identified as PCPs see younger patients (mean age 38.3 p < 0.01), primarily for preventive care (54.0 %, p < 0.01). Quality of care for cardiovascular disease was better in visits to cardiologists than in visits to generalists, but was similar or better in visits to generalists compared to visits to other medical specialists.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical specialists are less frequently serving as PCPs for their patients over time. Generalist, medical specialist, and obstetrician/gynecologist PCPs serve different primary care roles for different populations. Delivery redesign efforts must account for the evolving role of generalist and specialist PCPs in the delivery of primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24567201      PMCID: PMC4026490          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2808-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  28 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of outcomes resulting from generalist vs specialist care for a single discrete medical condition: a systematic review and methodologic critique.

Authors:  Gerald W Smetana; Bruce E Landon; Andrew B Bindman; Helen Burstin; Roger B Davis; Jennifer Tjia; Eugene C Rich
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-08

2.  The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform?

Authors:  Diane R Rittenhouse; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A typology of specialists' clinical roles.

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-08

4.  Is there room for specialists in the patient-centered medical home?

Authors:  Robert A Berenson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Will generalist physician supply meet demands of an increasing and aging population?

Authors:  Jack M Colwill; James M Cultice; Robin L Kruse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The paradox of primary care.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Robert L Ferrer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Relationship of primary care physicians' patient caseload with measurement of quality and cost performance.

Authors:  David J Nyweide; William B Weeks; Daniel J Gottlieb; Lawrence P Casalino; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Who is maintaining certification in internal medicine--and why? A national survey 10 years after initial certification.

Authors:  Rebecca S Lipner; Wayne H Bylsma; Gerald K Arnold; Gregory S Fortna; John Tooker; Christine K Cassel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Ambulatory care provided by office-based specialists in the United States.

Authors:  Jose M Valderas; Barbara Starfield; Christopher B Forrest; Bonnie Sibbald; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Specialists/subspecialists and the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Neil Kirschner; Michael S Barr
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  28 in total

1.  Capsule Commentary on Weng et al., Assessing the Quality of Osteoporosis Care in Practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Pfoh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Association between length of stay and readmission for COPD.

Authors:  Seppo T Rinne; Meredith C Graves; Lori A Bastian; Peter K Lindenauer; Edwin S Wong; Paul L Hebert; Chuan-Fen Liu
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Toward the Effective Co-management of Patients with Cirrhosis by Primary Care Providers and Specialists.

Authors:  Rena K Fox
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Disentangling the Linkage of Primary Care Features to Patient Outcomes: A Review of Current Literature, Data Sources, and Measurement Needs.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Eugene C Rich; Alyssa Maccarone; Catherine M DesRoches; Robert J Reid
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Measuring Comprehensiveness of Primary Care: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Eugene C Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Making the case for general internal medicine.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Comparing Use of Low-Value Health Care Services Among U.S. Advanced Practice Clinicians and Physicians.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Christina C Wee; Roger B Davis; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Patient screening for early detection of aortic stenosis (AS)-review of current practice and future perspectives.

Authors:  Martin Thoenes; Peter Bramlage; Pepe Zamorano; David Messika-Zeitoun; Daniel Wendt; Markus Kasel; Jana Kurucova; Richard P Steeds
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Use of Primary Care and Specialty Providers: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Authors:  Melissa A Romaire
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Differences in Rates of High-Value and Low-Value Care Between Community Health Centers and Private Practices.

Authors:  Carlos Irwin A Oronce; Robert J Fortuna
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.