Literature DB >> 19996399

Relationship of primary care physicians' patient caseload with measurement of quality and cost performance.

David J Nyweide1, William B Weeks, Daniel J Gottlieb, Lawrence P Casalino, Elliott S Fisher.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Sufficient numbers of patients are necessary to generate statistically reliable measurements of physicians' quality and cost performance.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether primary care physicians in the same physician practice collectively see enough Medicare patients annually to detect meaningful differences between practices in ambulatory quality and cost measures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Primary care physicians in the United States were linked to their physician practices using the Healthcare Organization Services database maintained by IMS Health. Patients who visited primary care physicians in the 2005 Medicare Part B 20% sample were used to estimate Medicare caseloads per practice. Caseloads necessary to detect 10% relative differences in costs and quality were calculated using national mean ambulatory Medicare spending, rates of mammography for women 66 to 69 years, and hemoglobin A(1c) testing for 66- to 75-year-olds with diabetes, preventable hospitalization rate, and 30-day readmission rate after discharge for congestive heart failure (CHF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of primary care physician practices with a sufficient number of eligible patients to detect a 10% relative difference in each performance measure.
RESULTS: Primary care physician practices had annual median caseloads of 260 Medicare patients (interquartile range [IQR], 135-500), 25 women eligible for mammography (IQR, 10-50), 30 patients with diabetes eligible for hemoglobin A(1c) testing (IQR, 15-55), and 0 patients hospitalized for CHF. For ambulatory costs, mammography rate, and hemoglobin A(1c) testing rate, the percentage of primary care physician practices with sufficient caseloads to detect 10% relative differences in performance ranged from less than 10% of practices with fewer than 11 primary care physicians to 100% of practices with more than 50 primary care physicians. None of the primary care physician practices had sufficient caseloads to detect 10% relative differences in preventable hospitalization or 30-day readmission after discharge for CHF.
CONCLUSION: Relatively few primary care physician practices are large enough to reliably measure 10% relative differences in common measures of quality and cost performance among fee-for-service Medicare patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19996399      PMCID: PMC2811529          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  19 in total

1.  Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.

Authors:  Sarah L Krein; Timothy P Hofer; Eve A Kerr; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Physician clinical performance assessment: prospects and barriers.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; Sharon-Lise T Normand; David Blumenthal; Jennifer Daley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program.

Authors:  Stephen F Jencks; Mark V Williams; Eric A Coleman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Inconsistent report cards: assessing the comparability of various measures of the quality of ambulatory care.

Authors:  Tejal K Gandhi; E Cook Francis; Ann Louise Puopolo; Helen R Burstin; Jennifer S Haas; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Health care reform requires accountable care systems.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease.

Authors:  T P Hofer; R A Hayward; S Greenfield; E H Wagner; S H Kaplan; W G Manning
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A house is not a home: keeping patients at the center of practice redesign.

Authors:  Robert A Berenson; Terry Hammons; David N Gans; Stephen Zuckerman; Katie Merrell; William S Underwood; Aimee F Williams
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Benchmarking physician performance: reliability of individual and composite measures.

Authors:  Sarah Hudson Scholle; Joachim Roski; John L Adams; Daniel L Dunn; Eve A Kerr; Donna Pillittere Dugan; Roxanne E Jensen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001.

Authors:  Stephen F Jencks; Edwin D Huff; Timothy Cuerdon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  24 in total

1.  Introduction. Apple Pickers or Federal Judges: Strong versus Weak Incentives in Physician Payment.

Authors:  Richard Kronick; Lawrence P Casalino; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Blending group and practice site scores to increase the reliability of physician quality information.

Authors:  William H Rogers; Kristy Thornton; Ted von Glahn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Validating a vignette-based instrument to study physician decision making in trauma triage.

Authors:  Deepika Mohan; Baruch Fischhoff; Coreen Farris; Galen E Switzer; Matthew R Rosengart; Donald M Yealy; Melissa Saul; Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Trends and quality of care in outpatient visits to generalist and specialist physicians delivering primary care in the United States, 1997-2010.

Authors:  Samuel T Edwards; John N Mafi; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Market power and provider consolidation in physician markets.

Authors:  Samuel A Kleiner; William D White; Sean Lyons
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-01-23

6.  Cost profiles: should the focus be on individual physicians or physician groups?

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; John L Adams; J William Thomas; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  When does adoption of health information technology by physician practices lead to use by physicians within the practice?

Authors:  Sean R McClellan; Lawrence P Casalino; Stephen M Shortell; Diane R Rittenhouse
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Interest in health information exchange in ambulatory care: a statewide survey.

Authors:  E Tham; S E Ross; B K Mellis; B L Beaty; L M Schilling; A J Davidson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Antipsychotic prescribing: do conflict of interest policies make a difference?

Authors:  Timothy S Anderson; Haiden A Huskamp; Andrew J Epstein; Colleen L Barry; Aiju Men; Ernst R Berndt; Marcela Horvitz-Lennon; Sharon-Lise Normand; Julie M Donohue
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Reliability of Physician-Level Measures of Patient Experience in Primary Care.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Klea D Bertakis; Daniel J Tancredi; Elizabeth M Magnan; Peter Franks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.