Literature DB >> 24566930

Is airwayscope more effective than Macintosh laryngoscope?

Xin Long Cui1, Fu Shan Xue, Rui Ping Li.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24566930     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-014-1801-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment.

Authors:  E C Behringer; M S Kristensen
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 2.  Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin?

Authors:  M R Rai; M T Popat
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Comparative analysis of airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation primarily for cardiac arrest in prehospital setting.

Authors:  Takahiro Arima; Osamu Nagata; Takeshi Miura; Katsuki Ikeda; Tomoya Mizushima; Azusa Takahashi; Koji Sakaida
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Utility of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for airway management during chest compressions in 27° left-lateral tilt: a manikin simulation study of maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Hanako Kohama; Nobuyasu Komasawa; Ryusuke Ueki; Noriyasu Yamamoto; Chikara Tashiro; Yoshiroh Kaminoh; Shin-ichi Nishi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.