Literature DB >> 22074080

Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment.

E C Behringer1, M S Kristensen.   

Abstract

A myriad of new intubation equipment has been introduced commercially since the appearance of Macintosh/Miller blades in the 1940s. We review the role of devices that are relevant to current clinical practice based on their presence in the scientific literature. The comparative performance of new vs traditional direct laryngoscopes, their complications, their use in awake intubation techniques and the prediction of unsuccessful intubation with new devices are reviewed. Manikin studies are of limited value in this area. We conclude that in both predicted and unpredicted difficult or failed intubation, carefully selected new intubation equipment has a high success rate for tracheal intubation. Ideally, such devices should be available in all settings where tracheal intubation is performed. Most importantly, experience and competence with any of the new devices are critical for their successful use in any clinical setting.
© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22074080     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06935.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  16 in total

1.  Use of an Endotrol endotracheal tube to facilitate orotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes.

Authors:  Kun-Peng Liu; Fu-Shan Xue; Yi Cheng; Rui-Ping Li
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Comparing lightwand-guided intubation techniques.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Liu; Fu-Shan Xue; Hui-Xian Li
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Is airwayscope more effective than Macintosh laryngoscope?

Authors:  Xin Long Cui; Fu Shan Xue; Rui Ping Li
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Prediction in airway management: what is worthwhile, what is a waste of time and what about the future?

Authors:  W H Teoh; M S Kristensen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Comparing ultrasound-guided and fiberscope-guided intubation.

Authors:  Shi-Yu Wang; Fu-Shan Xue; Ya-Yang Liu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Facilitated nasotracheal intubation in patient with restricted mouth opening aided by D-blade of C-Mac videolaryngoscope and Schroeder's directional stylet.

Authors:  Abdullah M Al-Jadidi; Rashid M Khan; Sujit V Nair; Naresh Kaul
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-07

7.  Assessment of Truflex articulating stylet versus conventional rigid Portex stylet as an intubation guide with the D-blade of C-Mac videolaryngoscope during elective tracheal intubation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aida Al-Qasmi; Wafa Al-Alawi; Azharuddin Mohammed Malik; Rashid Manzoor Khan; Naresh Kaul
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  An awake double lumen endotracheal tube intubation using the Clarus Video System in a patient with an epiglottic cyst: a case report.

Authors:  Hyungseok Seo; Gunn Lee; Seung-Il Ha; Jun-Gol Song
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-02-28

9.  Evaluation of Karl Storz CMAC Tip™ device versus traditional airway suction in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Demis N Lipe; Randi Lindstrom; Dustin Tauferner; Christopher Mitchell; Peter Moffett
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07

Review 10.  A review of video laryngoscopes relevant to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Dharshi Karalapillai; Jai Darvall; Justin Mandeville; Louise Ellard; Jon Graham; Laurence Weinberg
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.