BACKGROUND: More than 400 preclinical studies report ≥ 1 compound as cytotoxic to multiple myeloma (MM) cells; however, few of these agents became relevant in the clinic. Thus, the utility of such assays in predicting future clinical value is debatable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined the application of early-phase trial experiences to predict future clinical adoption. We identified 129 drugs explored as single agents in 228 trials involving 7421 patients between 1961 and 2013. RESULTS: All drugs in common use in MM (melphalan, dexamethasone, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and doxorubicin) demonstrated a best reported response rate of ≥ 22%. Older agents, including teniposide, fotemustine, paclitaxel, and interferon, also appear active by this criterion; however, if mean response rates from all reported trials for an agent are considered, then only drugs with a mean response rate of 15% partial response are in clinical use. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that thresholds of 20% for best or 15% for mean response are highly predictive of future clinical success. Below these thresholds, no drug has yet reached regulatory approval or widespread use in the clinic. Thus, this benchmark provides 1 element of the framework for guiding choice of drugs for late-stage clinical testing.
BACKGROUND: More than 400 preclinical studies report ≥ 1 compound as cytotoxic to multiple myeloma (MM) cells; however, few of these agents became relevant in the clinic. Thus, the utility of such assays in predicting future clinical value is debatable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined the application of early-phase trial experiences to predict future clinical adoption. We identified 129 drugs explored as single agents in 228 trials involving 7421 patients between 1961 and 2013. RESULTS: All drugs in common use in MM (melphalan, dexamethasone, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and doxorubicin) demonstrated a best reported response rate of ≥ 22%. Older agents, including teniposide, fotemustine, paclitaxel, and interferon, also appear active by this criterion; however, if mean response rates from all reported trials for an agent are considered, then only drugs with a mean response rate of 15% partial response are in clinical use. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that thresholds of 20% for best or 15% for mean response are highly predictive of future clinical success. Below these thresholds, no drug has yet reached regulatory approval or widespread use in the clinic. Thus, this benchmark provides 1 element of the framework for guiding choice of drugs for late-stage clinical testing.
Authors: Marta Chesi; Geoffrey M Matthews; Victoria M Garbitt; Stephen E Palmer; Jake Shortt; Marcus Lefebure; A Keith Stewart; Ricky W Johnstone; P Leif Bergsagel Journal: Blood Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S A Schey; P Fields; J B Bartlett; I A Clarke; G Ashan; R D Knight; M Streetly; A G Dalgleish Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Kumar; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; S V Rajkumar; R Fonseca; S Geyer; C Allmer; T E Witzig; J A Lust; P R Greipp; R A Kyle; M R Litzow; M A Gertz Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Shirley D'Sa; Kwee Yong; Chara Kyriakou; Soumo Bhattacharya; Karl S Peggs; Barbara Foulkes; Michael J Watts; Stuart J Ings; Kirit M Ardeshna; Anthony H Goldstone; Catherine D Williams Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: D V Jackson; L D Case; E K Pope; D R White; C L Spurr; F Richards; J J Stuart; H B Muss; M R Cooper; W R Black Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1985-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Constantin Lapa; Ken Herrmann; Andreas Schirbel; Heribert Hänscheid; Katharina Lückerath; Margret Schottelius; Malte Kircher; Rudolf A Werner; Martin Schreder; Samuel Samnick; Saskia Kropf; Stefan Knop; Andreas K Buck; Hermann Einsele; Hans-Juergen Wester; K Martin Kortüm Journal: Theranostics Date: 2017-04-08 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Johannes M Waldschmidt; Stefan J Fruttiger; Dagmar Wider; Johannes Jung; Andreas R Thomsen; Tanja N Hartmann; Justus Duyster; Martin J Hug; Kareem A Azab; Manfred Jung; Ralph Wäsch; Monika Engelhardt Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Rafael Ríos-Tamayo; Agustín Martín-García; Carolina Alarcón-Payer; Dolores Sánchez-Rodríguez; Ana María Del Valle Díaz de la Guardia; Carlos Gustavo García Collado; Alberto Jiménez Morales; Manuel Jurado Chacón; José Cabeza Barrera Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 4.162