| Literature DB >> 35072775 |
Johannes M Waldschmidt1,2, Stefan J Fruttiger1,3, Dagmar Wider1, Johannes Jung1,2, Andreas R Thomsen4, Tanja N Hartmann1,2, Justus Duyster1,2, Martin J Hug3, Kareem A Azab5, Manfred Jung6, Ralph Wäsch1,2, Monika Engelhardt7,8.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematologic malignancy which ultimately develops drug resistance and evades treatment. Despite substantial therapeutic advances over the past years, the clinical failure rate of preclinically promising anti-MM drugs remains substantial. More realistic in vitro models are thus required to better predict clinical efficacy of a preclinically active compound.Entities:
Keywords: Auranofin; Bone marrow microenvironment; Bortezomib; Drug discovery; In vitro modeling; Multiple myeloma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35072775 PMCID: PMC9016043 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03854-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ISSN: 0171-5216 Impact factor: 4.322
Fig. 1Details of the conical agarose microwell array platform. A Photography of the agarose microwell disk inserted into a 6-well plate. B Lateral view showing conical microwells inside a membrane. C Sketch depicting distance co-culture. MM cells are seeded into 3D CoSeedis™, and then, the microwell array is placed on the monolayer composed of BM stromal cells. Agarose permeability allows for diffusion of gas and small biomolecules. Each cavity measures 1 × 2.1 mm. D Sketch showing cell aggregates in four microwells
Fig. 2Proliferation in the conical agarose microwell array. A Sketch depicting the experimental approach. Proliferation of RPMI-8226 was assessed in a flat two-dimensional (2D) monolayer as compared to liquid overlay technique (LOT) versus the 3D conical agarose microwell array (3D CoSeedis™) platform. B ATP content indicates a bell-shaped growth pattern for RPMI-8226 cells in the 2D and LOT model. Cell growth in the 3D microwell model was delayed but followed a sigmoidal pattern and was ongoing after 12 days of observation
Fig. 3Impact of HS-5 stromal co-culture on proliferation and cluster size. A ATP content in RPMI-8226 cells culture in the 3D conical agarose microwell array as mono- vs. HS-5 co-culture. B Cluster volume of RPMI-8226 cells culture in the 3D conical agarose microwell array as mono- vs. HS-5 co-culture measured by transmitted-light scanner method. C Sketch showing cell aggregates in three microwells. This model uses the measuring cup principle for determination of cell proliferation. D Microscopy and scan of agarose matrix disk containing cell aggregates (100 × , 25 × and 1 × )
Fig. 4Drug resistance in the conical agarose microwell array. A Microscopy (left panel) and confocal microscopy of one microwell show equal distribution of CFSE (green) and CellTrace Violet within an aggregate of mCherry-transduced RPMI-8226. B Comparison of PI positivity in untreated RPMI-8226 cells and RPMI-8226 cells treated with bortezomib (6 nM) over 48 h. C Comparison of CD138 positivity in untreated RPMI-8226 cells and RPMI-8226 cells treated with bortezomib (6 nM) over 48 h. D Comparison of PI positivity in untreated RPMI-8226 cells and RPMI-8226 cells treated with auranofin (3 µM) over 48 h. E Comparison of CD138 positivity in untreated RPMI-8226 cells and RPMI-8226 cells treated with auranofin (3 µM) over 48 h. Conditions in B–E varied by model (2D vs. 3D microwell) and co-culture (monoculture vs. HS-5 co-culture). P values are as indicated *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001
Fig. 5Long-term propagation of primary MM cells ex vivo. A Cytokine secretion measured by multiplex array from supernatants of RPMI-8226, OPM-2, and primary MM cells after 6 days with and without HS-5 co-culture. B Cluster volume measured by transmitted-light scanner methods shows the critical impact of co-culture for the propagation of primary patient specimens ex vivo (n = 6). Growth support is improved with HS-5 as compared to MSP-1. Cells continue to proliferate at day 21 ex vivo. C Longitudinal monitoring of primary MM cells derived from the bone marrow of a 51-year-old patient with high-risk IgG kappa MM. Assessment is shown for day 14 ex vivo using microscopy (left column), Pappenheim stain (middle panel) and IHC for CD38 (right panel). Serial monitoring demonstrated less cluster cell expansion of MM cells in monoculture (a). Plasma cell (PC) morphology via microscopy/Pappenheim stain remained apparent (b), but with few CD38 positive PCs in IHC (c). Co-culture with MSP-1 stimulated cluster expansion of primary PCs (d). PCs were densely accumulating (e) and led to much larger PC clusters with CD38 positive cells (f) in the presence of MSP-1 stromal support. Cluster size and CD38 positivity were further enhanced in g–i with HS-5 stromal support in 3D culture
Individual patient characteristics and summary
| # | MM subtype | BM infiltration | CG | Age (yrs) | Gender | Status | ISS | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IgA kappa | 80% | HR | 69 | Female | RRMM | 1 | MM |
| 2 | IgG kappa | 80% | HR | 70 | Male | RRMM | 2 | MM |
| 3 | kappa-LC | 80% | HR | 52 | Male | RRMM | 1 | PCL |
| 4 | IgG kappa | 80% | HR | 83 | Male | ID | 3 | MM |
| 5 | IgA kappa | 90% | HR | 66 | Male | RRMM | 3 | MM |
| 6 | IgG kappa | 90% | HR | 51 | Male | ID | 3 | MM |
| Σ median (range) | IgG ( | 80% (80–90%) | HR ( | 68 (51–83) | Female ( | RRMM ( | 1 ( | MM ( |
| IgA ( | Male ( | ID ( | 2 ( | PCL ( | ||||
| kappa-LC ( | 3 ( |
MM multiple myeloma, RRMM relapsed/refractory MM, ID initial diagnosis, PCL plasma cell leukemia, EM-MM extramedullary MM, CG cytogenetics, HR unfavorable cytogenetics defined as deletion 17p, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20) or gain 1q